The Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education, or FURRIES, Act, filed by Austin-area Republican State Rep. Stan Gerdes, would “prohibit any non-human behavior by a student, including presenting himself or herself, on days other than exempt days, as anything other than a human being.”

The law would allow for exempt days, such as Halloween and other school dress-up days.

The law defines “non-human” behavior as “any type of behavior or accessory displayed by a student in a school district other than behaviors or accessories typically displayed by a member of the homo sapiens species,” with provided examples being:

Using a litter box for the passing of stool, urine or other human byproducts

A personal or outward display, except during a school play or by a school mascot, through surgical or superficial means of features that are non-human such as using tails, leashes, collars or other accessories designed for pets

Using fur, other than naturally occurring human hair or a wig made to look like human hair

Artificial, animal-like ears

Other physiological features that have not historically been assigned to the human race through a means of natural biological development

Students who bark, meow, hiss or make other animal noises that are not human speech

Licking oneself or others for the purpose of grooming or maintenance.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Other physiological features that have not historically been assigned to the human race through a means of natural biological development

    Does that forbid earrings as well? They’re non-biological extensions/modifications of the human body.

  • halferect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    What world do these people live in? I just can’t imagine this is a issue and i imagine that passing a law like this will just lead to kids definitely shitting in litter boxes because breaking the law is fun, imagine the court case of a kid dressed like a cat and pissed in a box… straight to jail

  • Radioactive Butthole@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Man they keep coming back to the litterbox thing, it really freaks them tf out. Even though its been debunked dozens of time, my conservative friends all swear they know a guy that knows a guy that swears he saw one for real!

  • oyo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Maybe the constitution of the United States of America says something about this? Maybe like the first thing in the bill of rights? Nah I must be mistaken.

    • theshoeshiner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Schools have to maintain a certain level of order and conformity to function as intended. Courts have already ruled as much. You can’t engage in behavior which would prevent the system from working as intended e.g. walk around topless, yell profanities, play loud music, etc - things which you can obviously do in other public spaces. Wearing full body animal costumes or barking randomly, claiming its your identity, is just as ridiculous and just as disorderly.

      With that said, schools probably already had the tools they needed to stop this, so I’m not sure why a law was needed. Unless there was actually some furry zealot fighting against a school board.

      • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        43 minutes ago

        You can’t engage in behavior which would prevent the system from working as intended

        So, enforcing uniformity?

      • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        33 minutes ago

        yeah ok but like schools can make policy. If someone is doing something thats an issue there’s a dean for a reason.

        Also, I don’t think a headband with ears is really the biggest issue of our times right now. This is entirely useless and just for control. Same with banning books, there’s already systems in place. Globally banning things -that AREN’T an issue- does not help anybody at all.

        This is ONLY for erasure of demographics and control over the people. Starts with furries, then men in skirts, then anything queer at all.

  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Besides them being stupid as hell to conduct this ridiculous culture war, I take issue with another thing, the name:

    Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education

    It’s not unlawful until you forbid it. So the title makes no sense. You’re not forbidding the unlawful. You’re forbidding the previously lawful, making it unlawful.

    Stupid assholes.

    • Iceman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education

      In Texas parties only lawful alignment is allowed. We don’t care if your Good or Evil, as long as your not chaotic or neutral.

  • Narri N.@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Oh boy, the fascists have really done it now: they’re going after the beastpeople! Beware its poisonous spittle!

  • MiniMoose4Free@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Kinda like this one I know the litter shit is bullshit. Though we all knew those annoying ass kids in school.

  • yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I bark at them using my very human vocal cords (I don’t even have any other). Prove me on court that I was not using human vocal cords to bark. Or maybe I was using totally non-human made recording-speaker device?

    Or maybe my 1.7m tall fursuit was designed to be weared by my cat? No way even lololong house cat could be that big. (lie, I don’t own a fursuit, in any size, but point still apply).

    Oh I know! Some tailed buttplugs were totally designed for pets and it is all about being pet care!

    • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      tailed buttplugs

      The whole comment aside, just for those unaware, if you see someone with a tail in public, or just anywhere outside of sex-centered environment, it’s almost surely a belt.

      • yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Saw enough memes and internet stories, where some silly joker pulled such tail in public and it was not belt. So many stories, I’m nearly sure at least 1% of them were true.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      tailed buttplugs were totally designed for pets

      Now o want to see them try to debate this

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I admit that I block the furry and all its sexual representation on fedi when I see it. It doesn’t turn me on that much and feels weird. But that’s the same feeling a woman or man would have towards a gay person of the same sex or similar of different gender. This is sexism at its core. WTF!

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Not sexism, just bigotry. I’m not personally down with furries, as in its not my jam, but that doesn’t mean i have any right to stop them being who they are. You wanna dress up in a big fur suit, have at’er. It literally doesn’t affect me in anyway. I don’t like it, so I won’t participate in it, that’s all.