Can one still claim that the USA is a liberal democracy? Where do you draw the line?

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      5 days ago

      Late 19th century. There was some pushback, some anti-trust laws with teeth, and then decades of bloody union battles to secure rights workers and their elected officials have thrown away for 50 years.

      The concentration of wealth and influence of 10-16 people trumps that of hundreds of millions and is as bad or worse than it was during the robber baron era.

      Political representatives are bought and paid for which means the poor have no voice against the wealthy.

      We have a justice system that is incapable of prosecuting the wealthy and powerful, when it isn’t being stocked by ideologues.

      Meritocracy is dead; Birth has much greater correlation to wealth and power.

      Media is fully captured by the wealthy; they own the vast majority of media consumed: TV, film, news, social junk.

      Nice country you got here.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Remember when unions thought they were so Irreplaceable and important. That they would withhold Support for a second term from a Democrat, they didn’t think did enough for them. One of the biggest miscalculations and blunders of the post World War II era. Because first they came for the unions and labor power.

    • burgersc12@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I’d say around the beginning of the 1900s is when we truly lost the plot. While we, the workers, were given a few breadcrumbs over the years to appease us, the Owner class was strip mining the wealth at every level imaginable, there’s a reason people like Rockefeller and Carnegie were richer than heaven at this time in history.