this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
949 points (94.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21210 readers
58 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That's what I fucking hate about it, great extensions, couldn't fucking settle on an API that doesn't break every update. When will the gnome devs ever be content with themselves

    [–] cole@lemdro.id 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    there is no API, which is the problem. It's just straight code injection. That's why extensions can be so powerful. A stable API would compromise their freedom for sure

    [–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Okay then, I'm never gonna update gnome again I guess. The machine I use it on is for work, so I care about stability. Or should I have never chosen gnome in the first place?

    [–] cole@lemdro.id 4 points 1 year ago

    I'm not sure that is a fair reaction. If your workflow relies heavily on many complex extensions that have a history of updating slow it is probably worth just... waiting a bit? You don't HAVE to be on the bleeding edge of Gnome releases. With a fairly minimal extensions list I've not had problems updating to new releases for a long long time

    [–] wolii1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

    That’s just the logical conclusion of continuing development. And even if the API stays the same, the shell might function differently, which could lead to extension bugs, therefore it is safer to break them all until the extension developer validates it for the new version.

    You could of course force the internal stuff to be the same, but this would just stifle development and innovation.

    In my opinion, if you can only use Gnome with extensions, you shouldn’t use it in the first place. Personally, I do have extensions, but they do so little that I don’t have a problem waiting a week or two until they update. Extensions don’t influence my workflow, they just are small quality of life adjustments (e.g. hiding the battery indicator when docked to my monitor and fully charged etc).