this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
949 points (94.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21210 readers
58 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Windows2000Srv@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Me, casually running Mate and enjoying on stable and customizable it is. I'll let you guys fight while I enjoy my polished experience!

    I would love Wayland support tho...

    [–] binboupan@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Same, I love Mate but cannot use it due to it not supporting fractional scaling (I use a 4K TV as my monitor).

    [–] Pyroglyph@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I would have thought a 4K TV was enough to use 200% on, no?

    [–] binboupan@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

    No, since it's far too big for me to use

    [–] Bene7rddso@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

    Depends wythey have a 4K TV. If it's beccause they want to see more apps at the same time, no