this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
260 points (84.8% liked)

movies

1735 readers
586 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Anyway, Alien: Romulus is the seventh film about these particular monsters. According to the producers, the film takes the franchise ‘back to its roots’. So we get a group of grimy crew-mates piloting a big rust-bucket of a spaceship who pick up an extraterrestrial stowaway and end up having to use their wits and courage to survive as it gobbles them up, one by one.

And it’s not a bad film. It’s nicely creepy, the special effects are good, the acting is perfectly serviceable. In fact, I could give you a normal review of Alien: Romulus, but just writing this is making me feel a little crazy. It’s not a bad film, but it’s also a direct copy of a much better film that already exists. That film is called Alien, and it came out in 1979. It had Sigourney Weaver in it. It hasn’t vanished. If you have a Disney+ subscription or a torrent client, you can watch it tonight. Why have we made it again? What’s the point? Why have we spent the past 45 years – which is longer than I’ve been alive – making seven different versions of the same film? What on Earth is going on?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Remember when they re-released Star Wars episode 4 in 2015...

There are no new ideas. Just new talent to play old roles.

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Remember when they made Son of Frankenstein? A sequel to a sequel to a loosely adapted book back in 1939? Then went ahead and made another half dozen including Abbot and Costello meet Frankenstein?

This has always been the case with studios. They want to play it safe and make money.

If you want original contact, do what has always needed to be done, support independent artists.

[–] koberulz@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

The Sprinkler Sprinkled was released in 1896 and remade in 1897.