this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
260 points (84.8% liked)

movies

1735 readers
586 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Anyway, Alien: Romulus is the seventh film about these particular monsters. According to the producers, the film takes the franchise ‘back to its roots’. So we get a group of grimy crew-mates piloting a big rust-bucket of a spaceship who pick up an extraterrestrial stowaway and end up having to use their wits and courage to survive as it gobbles them up, one by one.

And it’s not a bad film. It’s nicely creepy, the special effects are good, the acting is perfectly serviceable. In fact, I could give you a normal review of Alien: Romulus, but just writing this is making me feel a little crazy. It’s not a bad film, but it’s also a direct copy of a much better film that already exists. That film is called Alien, and it came out in 1979. It had Sigourney Weaver in it. It hasn’t vanished. If you have a Disney+ subscription or a torrent client, you can watch it tonight. Why have we made it again? What’s the point? Why have we spent the past 45 years – which is longer than I’ve been alive – making seven different versions of the same film? What on Earth is going on?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The Bond franchise is an interesting one because they've essentially been remaking the exact same movie since Doctor No, and although there are definitely ups and downs, on balance it's still a good franchise! Virtually no continuity. Only occasional meta nods. In essence, every single Bond movie consists of...

  • Bond goes to exotic location

  • Bond engages in romantic shenanigans with one or more partners

  • Bond faces a threat ranging from personal to world-ending

  • Bond is menaced by a villain with some personal quirk

  • Bond engages in a popular extreme sport

  • Bond deals with a number of nameless goons plus at least one ascended chief goon, probably named, with their own particular quirk

  • Bond foils the plans of the bad guy and has an epilogue with a romantic partner

Change some variables, rearrange the furniture a little, but this is basically every single James Bond movie for the last sixty two years, and we still love them! It makes me think that originality is overrated.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

a fresh coat of paint on an old house is a good thing.

trying to remodel the damn thing to fit whatever is trendy here and now, ruins the whole house.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

and we still love them! It makes me think that originality is overrated.

Yea, kinda what I’m saying too. People like repetition and familiarity just as they like surprise and shock.