this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
33 points (85.1% liked)

Linux

48048 readers
722 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thejackimonster@wehavecookies.social 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

@wiki_me I would like to see this model work. Because free software definitely benefits from funding and it's far more transparent like this than financing software efforts with hardware funds.

[–] wiki_me@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

it's not that transparent , for example if i am considering funding signal , i can look at the 990 form , see the top salaries, the amount spent on salaries, the number of employees and calculate the average salary. I don't mind it if the shareholders make a 10-20 percent return but i don't want to to be a 90 percent return (which basically no public company has, from what i have seen in tech companies it is somewhere around 10-30 percent).

[–] Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 months ago

Woah, in 2021 their best paid developer got 775K. I wonder how much work he produced for that money.

@wiki_me My point is that the funding is optional and you can track all of Purism's efforts via their Gitlab instance.

I agree that you don't have fine-tuned control on what they should focus on. But I'm also not convinced users need to have this control.

Obviously it's more transparent when you donate to individual developers manually instead of going through a company. I don't disagree with that.

But in my terms it's still an improvement.