this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
335 points (91.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21210 readers
58 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 49 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    which, confusingly enough, is a linux subsystem under windows. The name sounds like the opposite.

    [–] xlash123@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Really just an English problem. Read it as it is a subsystem by Windows for Linux.

    But yeah, LSW would've been more clear. Plus, it's almost LSD.

    [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)
    [–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    Getting DOS within Linux would be pretty interesting to play with and may get my dad a step closer to abandon windows.

    [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

    There is DOSBox but idk how well that works

    [–] GreenSkree@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

    I think it makes more sense to read that it's a "Windows Subsystem for (running) Linux (applications/programs)".

    [–] notTheCat@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

    Maybe it's some marketing thing? Like their feature MUST start with Windows™ regardless of getting confusing as hell, it may also help not techie people who make decisions and want to still use a Windows™ solution suggested by a techie

    It should be Windows's Subsystem for Linux.

    A better acronym might be Windows' Linux Subsystem.