“I would, but I’m afraid she expired after we dipped her in liquefied fusible metal alloy.”

I have a revolutionary idea for cyber-secure car locks: KEYS!

“Ahaha. Yeah…”

I know I’ve mentioned how I hate this timeline, but it bears repeating.

I can certainly see why you took the picture. Nobody would believe you without photographic evidence.

That’s the most extraordinary example yet. How do you even locate these, uh, remarkable examples of craftsmanship?

I’m no lawyer, let alone a US lawyer, but can somebody explain how this isn’t a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which makes it a federal offense to intentionally access a “protected computer” without authorization or by exceeding authorized access?

There are so many options for classical American entrepreneurship here. God bless capitalism.

Hvem i hede hule har råd til at købe seks kilo chokolade om året? Givet det nuværende afsindige prisniveau ville det koste en bil eller to.

See, this is what I like about the Internet: No matter how obscure, a subject matter expert is almost always right there.

Thanks, buddy.

That sounds painful.

I maintain that the definition of wrong is a function of the intended outcome. The former method is absolutely the correct approach for obtaining 2 dimensional horse-smoothies. And morbidly repainting the workshop.

Straight to the middle of his designated landing zone. As we all know, he’s a well prepared kitty.

Much obliged, sir.

This is vitally important: I need to know where that’s from. For… uh, science. Yes.

Punchability is a highly competitive field these days. At this point, we should probably just make it an Olympic event.

Hell, make it PPV and it could probably finance an actual health care system for the US.

You definitely got the better deal. I mean… I wouldn’t necessarily object to seeing a hair brush used like that on a Nazi either, but only if it was inserted sideways or bristles first.

Well, I mean… It worked for ChatGPT, so…

Preach, brother. I don’t get the fetish with aiming for ‘natural’ dynamic range in a movie in the first place. I need these people to explain to me why reproducing the relative sound pressure of a fucking explosion relative to normal speaking volume is somehow desirable to me.

I’m sure whatever the AF are intending to ‘test’ will work just fine on the few CTs that might still be operational six months hence, prior testing or not. We’re talking about a car that can be stopped in its tracks by light snowfall or being left outside in mild rain. I’m no expert, but somehow I don’t think a quick burst of 30 mm PGU-14/B armor-piercing incendiary rounds or a Hellfire missile will experience any issues.