@tiny_electron

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 15 days ago

Baguette

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 15 days ago

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 1 month ago

Sorry but in France we say “Ouaf” signature look of supériorité

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 1 month ago

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 2 months ago

We will strike cancer down with the power of science! I am so hopeful for medical progress in the next decade

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 3 months ago

Interstellar travel is possible after all

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 3 months ago

AI image

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 4 months ago

Good bye

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 4 months ago

Surviving mars has a really nice ost to work to

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · edit-2 6 months ago

Us government: please send humans to the Moon

NASA: Okay then give us the money to do it

Us government: NOPE

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 6 months ago

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 7 months ago

Tldr ftw

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 8 months ago

This graph gives the impression that the total installation number has been multipliés x4 or X5 while it is not the case when looking at the raw numbers.

Any variation can look impressive if you zoom enough, that’s why you need a baseline at 0. This way you see thé entire scale of the phenomenon

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 8 months ago

Cocorico

Bruits de noyade

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 8 months ago

Gris

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 9 months ago

Good to see not everything is going through enshitification. Thanks Proton!

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 9 months ago

Yeah we won’t be needing proper raytracing with this kind of tech it’s mind blowing

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 9 months ago

The quality is really superior to what was shown with Lumiere. Even if this is cherry picking it seems miles above the competiton

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 10 months ago

This never gets old lmao

tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works · 11 months ago

It is just a logical statement. A theory must maximize data fitting and minimize assumption. You cannot beat a theory that fits all the data with only one assumption.

Sadly we are not having a debate as I’m giving arguments and you are not willing to criticize them on a core level. I hope other people find this one sided conversation useful.