Ce să vă zic, mă, bine ați venit? bine ați venit, rău ați nimerit. La locu’ ăsta îi zice șerpărie, de la șerpii care umblă pe-aicea. Dracu’ știe cum au ajuns…

  • 0 Posts
  • 6 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
Cake day: July 6th, 2024
  • Cătă@mstdn.rotoPolitics@beehaw.org•The Only Kind of “Political Violence” All U.S. Politicians Oppose
    1·
    4 months ago

    @t3rmit3 I was talking about the current elections. I do not think that that guy’s act was a specific act of revenge for the January 6th insurrection at the Capitol, especially if that guy was a Republican registered voter. Otherwise, he could have acted sooner instead of waiting for a presidential term to finish. The guy’s attempt was specifically due to Trump’s current nomination as a candidate. That’s why I asked you how did it already happen during this election process, not in the past.

    Yes, absolutely.

    I think you might not be that different from a Republican on this one :) even though for a different reason.

    I think you’ve got the question backwards. States are the worst instigators of violence against marginalized, smaller, and weaker groups

    States are also the ones using public money to fund healthcare centers, centers for people in need (eldery, women escaping abusive relationships, unwanted children), they are also making the public space more accessible for people with disabilities, they are providing public transport options for people unable to ensure themselves this option, sometimes even providing means of communications (through mail for example). Of course, you could point out that there is more work to be done in some cases and in many countries, but it’s still an effort in the right direction and, imo, these sometimes provide better options than letting individuals work by themselves in order to solve these problems.

    If you’d ask me, I would feel safer in this regard when accessing these services provided by the state instead of relying on a fringe (sometimes) armed group, looking to gain power for themselves. But that’s just me, I guess…

  • Cătă@mstdn.rotoPolitics@beehaw.org•The Only Kind of “Political Violence” All U.S. Politicians Oppose
    1·
    4 months ago

    @t3rmit3 My server is dead today, so I cannot reply from my main account.

    Obviously, yes? […]

    I gasped for a moment, but yes, we are talking about internal violence committed by a group of people inside that country.

    Hmm, you mean like has already happened?

    How exactly has it already happened, more specifically, during this election? Did anyone try to shoot Biden or any Democrat in this campaign?

    Assassinations are an action that occurs to protect a given status quo.

    This is highly debatable. The nazis, fascists, legionnaires did a lot of politically motivated crimes in order to get in power. Does that make them the protectors of the status quo? What about various terrorist organizations around the world? What about people trying to kill Hitler? Anyway, I won’t go on with this because it is more of a separate discussion.

    But do you think that a state that doesn’t have this ability of protecting its own power and its own monopoly on violence would be a safer, freer and more just to its people than a state that has it? Do you think that such a state could protect marginalized, smaller and weaker groups better than a state that has this monopoly of violence?