Wow, such a thoughtful and useful comment. I had to be carful to avoid spoilers and you were super sensitive to that while still giving great advice. Bravo and thank you.

The controller support seems good, but this style of platform shooter is pretty rough in general with the swivel aim. I think you could skip this one if you are a controller user (I love them too).

Got any wise tips on how to enjoy the game, without giving anything away? I am at home in these sandboxes, but wouldn’t want to miss out on something fun.

It isn’t sleeping, I’m just being dramatic. But, simple insects often just have resting periods, kind of like a cat. They’re still alert, generally.

Thank you. I feel better now.

So there’s a neat trick for Odonata to differentiate between Damsels and Dragons. Look at the wings — do they “fan out” or are they “in line” with the abdomen? If they “fan out”, and all four wings are roughly the same shape and size, it’s a Dragonfly. If the wings are “in line” with the abdomen and the forewings and hindwings have slightly or even dramatically different shapes, it’s a Damselfly.

Using this logic, we’re looking at a Damselfly here. This can be confirmed by looking at the insect’s body, it’s very slim, whereas Dragonflies tend to have stouter body segments.

As for a species, at a glance, it looks an awful lot like an Ebony Jewelwing to me, but I’m not going to identify it with those pictures, as pretty (and haunting) as they may be, there isn’t enough detail to use a key. But the colors, shape, and wing patternation are decently convincing that this is a female Calopteryx maculata.

Thanks for sharing!

Video: https://files.catbox.moe/zygffp.mp4

Your entire argument applies to books as well.

It’s a bad argument.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

I always find it so extraordinary when someone replies to one of my comments with some off-the-wall shit like this.

You’re splitting hairs I already split. I specifically pointed out that their core products, you know, the things that actually matter, render the company among the most-reliable tech giants out there. I explicitly countered the notion that the fling-shit-and-see-what-sticks method is anything other than an elaborate R&D scheme.

Yet, here you are, responding to me raging about Google’s failproducts as if I didn’t JUST get finished explaining what that’s all about and how it doesn’t detract from their ability to generate income. They’re not lunatics, you just don’t understand what’s happening. Which again, is wild, because you’re literally responding to a comment where I explained what’s happening.

Mission Specialists.

They were given trivial tasks to perform to justify the title. It was in bad faith and should have rung alarm bells. But I anticipate for the luxury thrill-seeker, they may be accustomed to fancy titles for their trips, and didn’t even really think about it.

Those traffic signs can be placed for bikes, and paint on a road is not made specifically for cars. With that in mind, the paint is clearly intended for bikes here.

Also, why would you need a “cars prohibited” on a bike road at every visible interval? Why would you need bollards? Are you worried that you’re going to accidentally drive down a bike road? Are the large bikes painted onto the obviously-narrowed lanes not obvious enough?

A seriously weird comment.

There is no set of raw data that cannot be laundered into a new system.

They removed the messages because they wanted to.

Fair enough, I suppose we’ll see soon enough. And it may or may not be extremely cathartic. :D

But that’s the thing. She isn’t taking the L on this. That’s my point. She seems to just be chillin’, doing fuck all. Everyone knows it’s Musk running it.

This isn’t a case where he needed to bring in a fall guy CEO for a difficult business choice. This is a case where he brought in a new CEO to literally save the corporation, and she’s doing nothing and nobody is blaming her. It’s surreal.

Nobody is talking about it, but does that advertising exec that Musk hired for CEO take a massive hit to her career for any of this?

It seems surreal to have a ghost CEO who isn’t responsible for anything such a large company does. But that’s exactly what’s happening here.

It pains me to defend a corpo, but calling Google unreliable for their “fling shit and see what sticks” methodology for developing new products is inaccurate. Google/Alphabet is actually one of the most reliable corpos in the tech sphere, relatively-speaking, if you analyze their core products throughout the years.

Yes, it does feel like Google retires projects faster than they instantiate them. But that’s by design. The core product (selling advertising on SERPs/YouTube/AdWords/etc) is about as reliable as it gets, and that’s where they get their money.

Obligatory “fuck corporations.”

This post is weird. You’re typing like you’re in charge of things, but you’re apparently not.

It’s one thing to show some initiative, but you’re literally demanding a full report like the Lemmy devs work for you. You sound like someone who does this kind of thing for a living and felt the need to flex. Because otherwise, what the hell are you even doing?

Setting neurotically-specific demands for the developers makes sense if you represent a big instance or something, but you’re literally just a dude. You could have framed this entire post in a different way and gotten away with it. Right now, it’s creepy to anybody who actually reads the entire thing.