Works for me with Lemmy-UI. I’m guessing whatever client/browser you’re using is including the period at the end of the sentence in the URL.

I suppose you could argue an “illegal number” is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number.

For example, the HD DVD encryption key saga was originally fought via DMCA notices to Digg: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AACS_encryption_key_controversy

The only real answer here is talk to an actual lawyer rather than a bunch of Joe Blows on the internet. Case in point: Laws will vary depending on country and you haven’t specified what country you’re in. The set of laws you’re subject to are possibly entirely different than the set of laws each commenter here is familiar with. Never take legal advice from the internet.

But if you’re only looking to publish the source code as a resume item, it’s not worth the legal exposure or time/money to talk to a lawyer. Find something else to write and put on your resume.

An interview is just a test.

Whenever I speak with students/new grads about interviewing I actually specifically advise them that an interview is not a test. Yes, you need to have a certain level of base skills, but beyond that, an interview is much more like a date than a test. I say this because you can do everything right and still be rejected. It doesn’t mean that you did anything wrong or there’s anything with wrong with you, but rather there just wasn’t a match between you and the company you were interviewing with at that point in time. There are so many factors entirely outside of your control that determine if you’re given an offer or are rejected to the point that I find it really tough to consider it a “test” in the academic sense where you need to score a certain value to pass or fail it.

Likewise, it’s incredibly common for students/new grads to focus heavily on the technical skills while completely ignoring the soft skills. The best thing you can do in an interview is make the interviewer like you and want to work with you. It’s amazing how many people will overlook subpar technical skills either consciously or subconsciously if they feel comfortable with you (the amount of borderline incompetent people I’ve seen hired that are otherwise smooth talkers is astounding). It seems like the author of the linked to article here might be falling into that trap too. He writes about his technical experience heavily but does not touch on the soft skills at all, even questioning at one point that he may simply be bad at interviewing which is a strong sign to me that he’s not presenting himself well in the interview.

This is something that transcends software engineering. If you’re a sociable and likeable person you’ll go far further in life than the person that is quietly a genius but doesn’t work well with others. I wish more people folks in this industry would focus on that side of the coin instead of simply saying “grind Leetcode more to get more offers.”

Don’t feed the trolls y’all.

Here’s why making assumptions about someone’s motivations less than 24 hours from an event is misguided at best: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/24/us/alaska-airlines-off-duty-pilot-arraignment.html

Still want to claim this was deliberate terrorism?

Would you question it if he had a foreign sounding name?

That’s irrelevant. This isn’t a race/nationality thing yet for some reason you feel the need to make it one.

Also, if it was something like suicide or something, we would have heard about it by now.

It has been less than 24 hours. How in the world would we have known this person’s full intentions by now?

And what evidence do you have to support that claim? You don’t know this person’s motivations. You’re making assumptions here too.

“Bought” as in handed down from a family member so who am I argue to with that? It’s fairly low mileage (<50k) and it wasn’t used as a dedicated plow truck, just had a plow installed during the winter for dealing with clearing a long road back to a cabin. It wasn’t laying down salt at all. But yes, rust is certainly something I’ve been keeping an eye on.

Good point, I think the on-road tires on it already are the biggest thing holding me back, not the diff.

Whew, that’s a lot to consider! This truck previously had a snowplow on it. Any chance of using that mount for a winch?

Ah yeah, a winch is a great idea. Yeah, I’m staying on forest roads, but those roads have tons of potholes so I was thinking something for a better suspension would be best even if staying on the roads. I already upgraded the headlights to LEDs which are super bright. I think a candle was brighter than the stock sealed beam ones!

Thanks! Yeah I know the F250 had an option for an LSD so I was hoping it would be fairly straightforward to swap one in.

Any advice on what to look into for shock upgrades? And yeah I have no problems with clearance so I wasn’t planning on doing a lift. These roads would be closed by the forest service long before I ran into clearance issues on one of them!

deleted by creator

Ongoing, I max out my retirement funds every year.

Yeah that’s a good point. My recent contributions were certainly focused around mid 2020 - mid 2021. I’m at roughly 70% VTSAX, and then 10% each VTIAX, VGSLX, and VUSTX.

Do you think it’s worth cutting losses in VGSLX and reinvesting in VTSAX? I guess it depends on how much prolonged high interest rates are going to continue to weigh on the real estate sector.

It’s split across a few accounts so it’s difficult to put a single, exact percentage on, but I’m at roughly 70% VTSAX, and then 10% each VTIAX, VGSLX, and VUSTX.

I’ve shied away from target date funds because I’ve wanted to have more control over the underlying allocations (potentially to my own detriment, I’ll accept responsibility for that).

I think so? It’s the performance chart from Vanguard.

Yeah, I’m definitely not planning on taking it out. I still have a long way to go before retirement. I was more concerned about if I’m investing into the right funds and if my returns were anomalous for the given time period.