data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd6a6/bd6a696ab722705ecaf11d218f67c51af284ab05" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd746/bd7464138a78a60760b85169dfd6deb1efca5592" alt=""
You’re thinking of Fiduciary Duty
For example, certain kinds of financial advisers have a fiduciary duty - that is, a duty to act in the best interests of their clients. But the ones with whom mere mortals interact are (quite predatory) salesmen.
In the same vein, I expect politicians do act in good faith towards their larger donors, but don’t see themselves as owing anything to their constituents.
For much (most?) of our history federal income came exclusively from tariffs, and the President is very fond of evoking that era. It would not be unprecedented for it to happen again.
Can’t argue with the moderation given the slant of this community (I landed here from “All”), but I continue to maintain I’ve been posting in good faith.
Have a blessed day.