Men statistisk set, er vi ikke ret gode i Danmark til at have offentlig transport der kører til tiden?
I forhold til hvad vi betaler for det system? Overhovedet ikke. Vi betaler sindssygt meget for et OK system hvor andre lande betaler meget mindre for et system der ikke køre meget værre. Det er tilgengæld en meget dansk måde at operere på!
Det forhindrer jo udviklingen og foreningslivet for discgolfspillere. Vi synes, at det er ærgerligt, at vi ikke kan få lov at have de faciliteter, som hører til discgolf, hvis det fortsat skal udvikle sig til til gavn og glæde for alle.
Miljøstyrelsen er ikke imod, at discgolfbanerne findes. Som et forslag til en løsning tilbyder de, at discgolfklubberne kan lave underlag til tee-stederne, som er lavet af ‘naturmaterialer’.
Altså, personen er jo bare sur over at han har brugt penge på fliser uden at tjekke om det var lovligt.
Pimax would rather ban you from their support forum than admit your unit might have arrived broken. Keep that in mind if you’re thinking of getting one.
So 300.000 ligger inde diverse sygdomme næste uge? Det bliver en uproduktiv uge…
Måske er jeg bare nedern fordi jeg har været syg i næsten 2 måneder 🥲
Cheaters battle each other all the time, deliberately, in private matches. The reason it’s not a sport with spectators is likely because if you’re a known cheater then you’re stuck with that label forever no matter what you do.
I couldn’t give a Windows PC to my grandparents, either, though.
Sometimes I just sit and stare at my apache access logs because I’m bored
GoAccess is pretty nice for a broad overview of Apache logs, also.
For other services I generally just look at them every now and then and if something looks off I investigate. I found a cryptominer on my network once because it was spamming DNS and that shows up in DNS logs.
The 2 images in “A little introduction” both seem dead.
Jeg har en sindssyg opfordring:
måske lad bilen stå engang imellem
Don’t pretend that you would engage with my argument faithfully under any circumstances.
I’m impressed at your inability to just engage with the argument presented, but what else can be expected from a terminally online All-poster.
I guess disagreeing with even a shred of your stance immediately makes me a carbrain boomer
I didn’t call you a boomer but thanks for telling on yourself
who uses marginalized groups as a prop to justify the status quo
Yes, because that’s what you did, and are still doing.
Are you even willing to examine an outside argument or use case that challenges your views?
If they present sound logic. Right-On-Red kills people, that’s why it’s primarily a US thing because nobody else is that insanely car-brained.
Telling an elderly or disabled person in America to “just use the bus, it’s better for everyone” isn’t a solution, it’s dogma. You are not operating in reality to tell someone for whom moving their own body takes a large physical toll, to take the bus or cycle. Get over yourself and your ideology and see that there are people who genuinely need independent mobility, and that public transport is not a viable solution for everyone.
I did not once tell any disabled person to get out of their personal vehicle. You are pretending that I did because you just want to argue but you have no points and you don’t believe in anything. You could’ve had a point about pragmatic politics but I’m not gonna make your argument for you. You’re old enough to do that yourself.
Yes it can be better, yes there needs to be change,
Glad we’re on the same page. I can’t understand why you are arguing against repealing Right-On-Red, then. A change that would literally save lives and require zero infrastructural investment.
Not everyone subscribes to your ideological purity test, and all you’ve done is alienate people who may be sympathetic.
Nothing I’ve said is particularly exclusionary. I haven’t said all cars must go. I haven’t said all disabled people must walk. I said car-owners feelings are once again taking precedence over actual human lives. You are also still ignoring that disabled people seem to be getting around just fine, generally speaking, in countries that deprioritize cars.
I too have had too many close calls with cars and trucks.
So lets minimize that and get rid of Right-On-Red instead of telling me I’m a fucking puritan idealist for suggesting as much.
Do better, or you’ll find yourself alone voting for “car free utopia or nothing” law because you flip to insults at the first use case you couldn’t dismiss.
That’s funny, because my lefty extreme no-car utopia party is up in recent polling. They even control a district in inner Copenhagen. Denmark doesn’t have a pants-on-head retarded 2-party first-past-the-post system, by the way, so voting for what you believe in actually does work over here. I’m sorry you have to deal with your god awful system.
There is no conceivable universe in which you pull this shit out of your ass in good faith because I have dismissed your disabled-people use case like 4 times now. You’re just ignoring it because you don’t believe in anything and would rather pretend that you’re some holy centrist whose views of the world are infinitely nuanced and beyond the reach of idealists like myself because it’s apparently utopic to not wanna spend your last minutes on earth being dragged underneath an SUV.
Please explain to my low attention-span millennial avocado-brain how implementing a safer-for-all traffic intersection forces disabled people out of their cars, because that strangely doesn’t seem to be a problem in my municipality. Disabled people who are car-bound has, if I may be so bold, seemingly benefited from the safer intersections on account of pedestrians and bicyclists fearing less for their lives in traffic and thus encouraging them to walk or bike instead of drive, leading to less cars on the road meaning less congestion for the disabled car-bound people.
Also: Denmark, the UK and the Netherlands has shown us that disabled people get around on bicycle infrastructure just fine. I find it insulting that you pretend to champion disabled people but don’t actually understand how they use the infrastructure available… almost like you don’t actually care, but just wanted to make a dumb argument because it sounded good in your head.
I get it bro you like the wroom wroom but go to your local track on sunday and leave the rest of the city out of it thanks
I think you’ll find that the amount of emissions saved from idling at these intersections would be paid for a hundred-fold by just leaving the car at home for one short trip once a year. It essentially doesn’t exist. Additionally, fuck your congestion, I don’t care. You chose the car, you get to be stuck in traffic in it. I won’t accept any risk to my body because you can’t wait an extra minute.
Never forget the NULL sound
Fair enough. The actual car I was thinking of apparently did run on lithium, too, so it was a dumb comment.
you have to convince them to vote on your policies.
no I don’t and won’t because they don’t listen. If you want to get something done in politics, you lobby local politicians directly.
For the record, we don’t have right-on-red, here, because we’re not insane enough to think that’s a good idea. Bicycle lanes stop ~2 meters in front of cars so they’re visible and get to enter the intersection first because it literally saves lives. Fuck car-owners feelings.
piss off drivers,
oh no their precious feelings, once again taking precedence over human life
https://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/samfund/milliardaerfamilie-i-flyverskjul/10087325, https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torben_Østergaard-Nielsen
Torben Østergaard-Nielsen
Jeg antyder ikke noget, eller fremsætter nogen specifikke trusler, men personen bor umiddelbart i Middelfart sammen med en fantastisk stor samling af pisse-dyre biler.