brainw0rms [they/them]

What does this have to do with piracy

“I wish they hadn’t gone and made Star Trek political!”

get a load of this lost slava ukraini over here

average libertarian

For what it’s worth, I tend to agree with you. It’s definitely about the propaganda value and the perceived “moral high ground”, but the real question is how much are those things actually worth in the current state of the conflict. At least in my view, sadly very little.

over 40,000 palestinians are killed in revenge for october 7th

1 israeli hostage is killed by their guard in revenge for the murder of his children

We will have to agree to disagree, I think.

You seem to be under the false assumption that the Israeli government actually cares about bringing any of the hostages home safely, when it’s pretty obvious they don’t. Their actions have shown this very clearly. The hostages can’t be useful leverage if Israel doesn’t give a shit about them in the first place.

Given that Israel’s current governmental coalition is predicated on the continuation of the war, along with Bibi’s own impending legal peril once he is forced out of his position, why would you think they would ever agree to any kind of deal? It’s pretty obvious to anyone paying attention that all these elusive “ceasefire negotiations” Israel has “participated” in, have been in bad faith the entire time. They literally assassinated Hamas’ own lead negotiator! It’s merely a carrot they can wave around to convince the western audience to keep supporting them, “See? A ceasefire deal is just around the corner so keep those weapons and money flowing!”

This so called “division and turmoil” caused by the demonstrations sounds great and all, but it’s ultimately inconsequential and amounts to less than nothing unless they plan on putting an end to the current regime.

Were there no hostages Israel would never agree to a ceasefire. They would claim they need to eradicate Hamas no matter the cost.

So… you mean like how things are already? That’s the exact point I’m making, lmao.

The massive demonstrations for a ceasefire inside of Israel are to get the hostages out. Not because they care for Palestinians.

No shit. But what good is a “ceasefire” if it doesn’t actually end the war? Hamas has no incentive to agree to hand over hostages if Israel is just going to resume bombing the shit out of Gaza as soon as they’ve been released, which is what most of the demonstrators actually want.

I’ll be honest, at this point it’s no longer clear what purpose the hostages are serving anyway. The Israeli government is not negotiating for their return in good faith, and they haven’t deterred the wholesale glassing of the Gaza strip. There is seemingly no legitimate interest in getting the hostages back alive. Even if you consider the token Israeli “protests” being organized, most of those people aren’t actually demanding an end to the war. It’s fairly obvious the hostages are no longer serving as useful bargaining chips (if they ever were). I can’t say I really blame this guy.

In fact, one may even argue this was an act of mercy compared to the alternative of being indefinitely held prisoner in presumably pretty poor conditions, just waiting to be murdered by the IDF.

Jeb!

I’ll take “Conversations that never happened” for $500, Alex.

nor do the creatures their fruits are designed for

science illiterate ppl try to discuss evolution without using creationist phraseology challenge (impossible)

I’m being trolled here. Occam’s razor.

You think, in a quote where Biden was obviously already flustered, shitting the bed, misspeaking, and stuttering, that:

• Actually the parts that are convenient for your weird narrative, he wasn’t misspeaking
• He chose this moment to tell the world actually he wouldn’t have (or didn’t, as you posit) pick her for VP, despite proudly bringing up that he picked the first black woman for VP whenever he has the opportunity
• He would publicly call his VP unfit to serve as president, despite now endorsing her immediately after dropping out of the race
• All in the face of multiple statements he and his campaign have made before and after this, which contradict this weird narrative you seem to believe

And not just that:

• If you infer one word where he was clearly slurring (which you already pointed out), it would clarify the meaning of what he’s saying to something that would actually make sense for him to say: “Look, I wouldn’t have picked Vice President Trump (sic) [Harris] to be Vice President, [if] I think she’s not qualified to be president, so let’s start there. Number one.”

I don’t really get what you’re saying. To take the quote at face value, it makes no sense. Setting aside the VP Trump gaff, you think he intentionally said he wouldn’t have picked Harris as VP? So why did he? Especially if he believed she couldn’t be a viable president, given his age? I’m not arguing Biden isn’t a piece of shit - and I’m not sure what that has to do with anything I said. Especially considering him now endorsing her, to take this quote literally seems incredibly silly/bad faith.