Did they really just cover the whole blister thing with fishmeal? I mean including the plastic?

In the article it does not seem like automated messages. Rather guess that their fake news detection triggered, because links to these government sites spiked even though the sites were seldom mentioned before.

Da würde ich auch auf “fahrlässige Tötung” hoffen…

Warum? Ich präferieren auch ein einfaches i am Ende. Macht weniger den Eindruck aus dem Angelsächsischen zu kommen!

Schon, nur leider nicht den Preis runter. 😢

I actually see street cleaning teams here in Germany regularly where one person blows the dirt out from bike racks and from under parked cars and the other person sits in the big street sweeper to pick up the dirt. I think this is a very valid use for blowers. The blowers are electric, but I sure would.not mind them a bit more quiet.

Muss man im Zweifel politischen Druck machen. Nachfragen über IFG, etc. Vernetzt euch, bildet Banden! Der lokale ADFC und der VCD können gute Anlaufpunkte sein. In meiner Stadt werden Anzeigen tatsächlich bearbeitet, merkt man an geändertem Parkverhalten nach genug Anzeigen ;)

Naja. Es fehlt bei den Herstellern an Anreizen Autos zu bauen, die auch für andere Verkehrsteilnehmer:innen sicher sind. Die höheren Vorderkanten von den zunehmenden SUVs zum Beispiel führen nachweislich zu tötlicheren Unfällen mit Fußgänger:innen. Die Hersteller wiederum profitieren davon wenn andere Verkehrsteilnehmer:innen sich nicht sicher fühlen und doch auf ein Auto umsteigen.

Der Unterschied ist mir schon bewusst. Aber das ist doch genau das Problem. Würden Autohersteller haften für alle Schäden, die durch Unfälle mit ihren Fahrzeugen entstehen, würden sie ganz andere Autos bauen und den Fahrer:innen andere Vorschriften machen. Die Analogie hier ist aber eher dass die Gesellschaft hier für die Unachtsamkeit der Automobilist:innen haftet, aber nicht bereit ist Vorschriften zu machen.

You need to understand that this is not about sexuality, but about patriarchy. For them sex is about power over women, not about pleasing them. Cunnilingus focuses on female pleasure, which is a problem for this world view. Men unwilling to take part in the oppression of women are seen as “unmanly”. This is expressed through the accusation of being “gay”.

I think OP has every right to complain about it in public. Since it is not common knowledge (like you said), the community is obviously lacking awareness. Telling people of marginalized communities to make their complaints about discrimination in private is harmful and hinders progress. Lets talk about these problems openly, so we can find solutions together! PS: I think there is enough space in our hearts for admin appreciation and constructive criticism.

Genau meine Sorge. Wenn die Wähler:innen von der CDU einsammeln aber noch nicht mal so tun als hätten sie eine "Brandmauer ", hat die AfD direkt wen zum koalieren im Osten.

The gallery is here: https://f-droid.org/en/packages/org.fossify.gallery/

why do you dislike the name? I like it actually!

I don’t think the new owners can just pull it from F-Droid, I hope the F-Droid team has a code backup. I think they will migrate everything to fossify. With the gallery this already happened, the SMT Gallery vanished from my phone and the fossify gallery appeared. I guess that’s a good way to go, since for now fossify is just the same thing with a different name.

In that case: excellent suggestion. :)

I mostly agree with your rules, they seem well thought out. I have two objections: Firstly altered versions of AP seems hard to enforce. I think if the versions of AP are compatible enough for federation to work, we should let it run.

Secondly, and more importantly, the part were you want to defederate with servers that do not follow these rules is a really bad idea. If some small instance wants to consume the content from threads, their users may still add content to the fediverse. I think these rules would be a good recommendation for any new server admins and committing to these rules would be a good reason to join a server. But I don’t see any reason to turn this into a “you’re either with us or against us”-type conflict.

It’s not new actually. Maybe revived. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they

The interesting thing here is: this missleading headline comes from the official state news outlet of Germany…

Here’s the thing: people don’t make decision based on cost, but on what they feel what the cost is. For example: there are studies showing people underestimate the cost of car ownership by a factor of 2. They typically forget about the loss in value and the repair costs. Parking fees (if taken per occasion) are cost that people actually feel every day, making it more likely that they factor into their decision, maybe even more so than fuel costs.