Why is Amy standing in for Leeloo instead of Leela?
Why is Amy standing in for Leeloo instead of Leela?
Damn. I thought it was to get around copyright bots.
Yeah. How small are they if we turn their ashes into synthetic diamonds?
It just talks about the SAVE program, so nothing brand new.
First thing I thought of. Write an article when the fish start growing three eyes.
Seems more like a shower thought than a dad joke.
Self destructing in a little under 24 hours.
Agreed. People being awful in theaters has been a long-standing subject of countless jokes. It’s not in any way a new phenomenon. “Please silence your phone” adverts after the trailers happened long before Covid came around.
Only thing I thought was a painful cliche in the movie was the “no, I won’t kill the villain (after mowing down all of his minions like they were nothing) because I’m the good guy!” trope.
Aright, I’ll admit, that got an audible guffaw out of me.
It’s not. The media keeps wanting to make it so. There’s nothing Qanon about it. Jim Caviezel is a proponent of Qanon conspiracies, and that’s its only connection.
I know she can be “controversial” here, but Shoe0nHead did a video on it.
“Maybe I can sneak under it and the bridge won’t notice!”
It’s what plants crave!
It’s sad that they really can’t seem to get away from “guy with the same powers, but evil!” rut for antagonists in superhero movies. And seriously, the “my family makes me strong, not weak!” cliche too?
It’s an animated Star Wars series that takes place between the Original trilogy and the Prequel ones, closer to the Original, largely focused on the rise of the Rebel Alliance by following the crew of one Rebel starship.
I once saw a slogan on a button at a street vendor in Washington D.C. “Why do we kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong?” It’s stuck with me after two decades.