Can you give some examples 😅
Can you give some examples 😅
I’ve read the “learn more” bit now and I’m going to leave it switched on. (although I use uBlock anyway 😅)
I think this is a legitimate attempt to ‘fix’ the internet. It seems only very basic information on interactions with ads is recorded by the browser, and then it is anonymised. As an example, the advertiser should only receive counts of how many people bought a product after seeing a particular ad. I don’t think they can see what webpage anyone in particular came from, but maybe they can see that: 11% percentage of visitors came from example.com/some-page
Presumably the anonymised data is only provided once the pool is fairly large and wouldn’t show 100% of visitors came from cornhub when you only had one visitor 🤷♂️ Obviously websites will always see an IP address.
The idea is for this to substitute for traditional, more invasive, tracking. I think it may one day achieve that.
A warning though: I only just started reading about this.
Excuse me while I go and click that ‘learn more’ button…
I’ve had the same thing. I think orca’s retraction test is just too ‘easy’. I think the towers are too far apart.
This was it! I had my 10-25% (not degrees 😅) overhang speed set not to slow down at all. I now have it set to 30mm/s and I have a perfect result. Thank you 👍😁
Sorry, I didn’t follow that. Top layer of what? Not the actual top, top layer right?
You may actually be right even though I thought I had checked this. Orca’s overhang speeds are based on overhang percentage and not angle, I previously just looked at the number and assumed it was degrees 🤦♂️I will match the speeds for all overhang percentage ranges and see if that solves it 🤞
Thanks. I’ll experiment with temperatures first but I’ve got some different filament on the way too as it happens, so hopefully I’ll manage to escape the problem one way or another 😁
Thanks, I’ll give it a go.
It starts just underneath actually, but it still could be related 🤔 Maybe I need a test without numbers.
Thanks guys. I will try both and see what works. My layer adhesion is good / parts are strong though.
I thought it was unlikely I’d managed to damage it even before you said that, now I’m sure 😄
Thank you for your kind words. It’s back on the road now and just as good, if not slightly better than before the clutch started slipping.
I will watch the fluid level or maybe even bleed it once more then, but it seems it’s going to remain a mystery for now anyway.
I really appreciate you going to the trouble to try and help with this. Thank you very much 😁
I left it overnight, and now the gear change is back to normal and I have no idea why 😭
That’s a really great way to find the problem, and if it starts happening again I will follow exactly that process 🙏
It may not matter now, but for the sake of completing the picture:
If the problem comes back and I am able to find the cause, I will make sure to report back!
It’s a 2013 Dacia sandero II - 1.5DCI
It’s a 2013 Dacia sandero II - 1.5DCI
Yes, I did. I didn’t actually fully remove the transmission to avoid removing the front subframe. There was just enough space to separate the gearbox and engine and slot the new clutch assembly in.
I think it sounds like a single selector fork too, but I can’t think how I could’ve damaged it, since I don’t think I have done anything that should affect the internals of the gearbox 😢
Thank you for replying 😁 In this car’s case, the clutch was worn down to bare metal. Do you think maybe I could have bent the input shaft and this could cause it? I don’t hear any unpleasant sounds of uneven rotation though, which I might expect from that (based on no experience at all 😜)
Also what machine was it you mentioned?
Thank you 😊 I’ll go and look / feel where the linkages attach after I’ve finished writing replies 🙏
😈😈 Finally an advantage to using rEFInd 😈😈