If I ate something in silence, my partner would likely notice something was off immediately. The sound of even my own chewing (mouth closed, ofc) triggers my misophonia
Being a bodyless head with a freak long tongue is not only okay—it can be an exciting opportunity
If I ate something in silence, my partner would likely notice something was off immediately. The sound of even my own chewing (mouth closed, ofc) triggers my misophonia
see you next tomorrow
I particularly like this bit
At an agency meeting once, we played “never have I ever” and one of them was “nhie gone a week without showering;” I was the only one who had, and I got some seriously judgmental looks
I absolutely agree. As a therapist with personal experience, I think it would be cool af and an overall good idea if university degree courses for becoming a therapist included an elective- but highly encouraged- course which focuses on simulating different symptoms
I wasn’t asking you. I don’t have a problem blocking you
Hell yeah, I’m so ready to fight
I’m surprised to see an antinatalist support Harris. Seems morally inconsistent, though perhaps not from a consequentialist perspective. I’ve been blocking everyone sharing your sentiment, but I don’t wanna block one of the few antinatalists here, so I’m commenting instead
Is Harris’ loss my fault because I voted for De La Cruz? She could have easily earned my vote, but tried to court centrists and conservative voters instead.
They had more votes because many who voted democrat in 2020 voted red.
Source?
It’s practically art. I love it
That’s fair- I never bothered to check. It should be safe to assume though that even a vent posted here is of the shitpost variety, but this one isn’t
Is what you wrote meant to be a shitpost? What do you think a shitpost is?
Honestly, why does this keep happening? Is it federation weirdness putting it in the wrong community, or are people actively doing it?
Rats- you’re not acting fun stupid anymore, now its just annoying stupid, so I’m gonna move on.
Thanks for the good time!
160
Lol
add racism
Bruh. Like I could know you’re a racial minority.
I don’t get people banned
Respect, honestly. A few tweaks and you’re basically an anarchist already
Edit= sounds like crying about an edit to me.
Hey, you’re the one that told me to “fucking read” when you can’t read timestamps. Idk what to tell you
Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain.
You said “so no laws?” And I said “right.” That’s pretty clear cut to me. What do you want explained?
you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.
Fear not, I’m also part of plenty of other nonsense
If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing.
Lol
Little of what you’ve said makes much sense, so I had no way to know
Let’s make a few things clear:
Also- check timestamps. I edited that comment when your other reply came through, and responded over there.
Huh? I initially said “right.” Which means “correct”/“yes.” You never asked for an explanation. You asked a yes or no question, which I answered, and then complained that I didn’t offer an explanation?
That’s not asking for an explanation. You asked a yes/no question. Yes, no laws
You understand what severe dyslexia is correct?
Yeah
And yet you are still doing it
I was asking genuinely. You wrote a whole word that you wouldn’t use in that context if you weren’t a conservative (even by mistake), and I didn’t realize your use of it was an error. I’m not making fun of you for the error. I’m laughing at you for being conservative
No.
Okay, then link me to where you asked me, and link me to where I lied, please
Edit: disregard the “link me to where you asked me” part- responding to that in our other thread
Arguably, it could still just mean tomorrow, given that today was yesterday’s tomorrow. As every day is a tomorrow, the next tomorrow is just tomorrow