Why is content collection for generative AI so much worse than for search indexes?
Why is content collection for generative AI so much worse than for search indexes?
No, it’s just bad. Still worth testing. Kind of amazing how bad it can be. It can also be a practical joke to add to your bag.
Blue cheese and orange juice! It’s such a bad combo it’s worth trying.
deleted by creator
Yup, it’s bullshit. Here’s Daniel Ek’s response
There is no projectile drop in 5 meters. A point blank with an RPG is possible.
In Sweden (and perhaps all of EU?) it is not allowed to say “no x” if there’s normally no “x” in that type of product, e.g glutenfree butter.
I think this is far more common than one would hope. There are many senior developers out there who got their experience in a different time, when test coverage wasn’t important in many businesses. Writing test code is hard and it might be that your teammate simply don’t know how to do it.
If the tests aren’t there at approval time, they will never be there. I think it is perfectly fine to block approval, especially since you all agreed on it.
Solr is a great search engine. It won’t help you with the crawling, but if you manage to get the data into Solr you have a come far.
I drove to the Swedish province Värmland (known for fostering quite a few rally drivers). During the drive to get there, I could see how the ETA ticked down a few minutes every hour. While driving in Värmland, it was the opposite. The ETA ticked up, even while speeding a little.
That is wildly different depending on location and number of guests
You could fill the report with loads of sensitive personal information and then report them…
Det ligger nog något i talesättet “While the English are too polite to be honest, the Dutch are too honest to be polite.”
You have the current figures in real time here: https://elen.nu/elproduktion/
In Swedish, but still…