Both the wording of the rule and the use of the rule was very clear that this was about all criticism of Israel unless it’s “criticism” like “Israel doesn’t do enough to protect itself”.
That “guideline” is hate-speech and genocide-apologism in it’s most cynical form because it is disguised as anti-discrimination. The people who proposed and implemented it should be ostracized.
I suggest adding John Deer. Their current business model relies on violating GPL.
https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/17/john_deere_sfc_gpl/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XP7Qx1FF1hA
I’m using that term due to Séjourné using that reasoning, I changed it to reflect his wording more precisely.
I do not agree with him, that is why I inserted the “somehow”.
He wants to apply the law to everyone. Except to Israel, because accusing the jewish state of crimes they actually commit is somehow immoral.
At first I thought you’re trying to simply mock the position, then I reread the other comment and withdrew my upvote.
It’s not only the last sentence that is terrible - it’s the last two. And sadly I don’t think this is satirical.
With the information about the organzied harassment campaign that is openly available, I feel confident in judging that group as agitators and lawyers that terrorize human rights advocates.
At first I thought it was literally about the concept of infinity.
I’m a desktop User
I have no disagreement about that. I only wanted to convey that not 100% of it is a bubble.
That and the video where you are being captured and put into a vat of a green glowing substance.
There is plenty of AI that is already in use (for example in medical diagnostics and engeneering) so we can safely say that it isn’t “one giant bubble” - it might be overhyped when it comes to certain aspects like the ability to write a coherent and creative book that would have success on the market.
It looks like this is for US citizens only. If I am wrong please correct me.
I’m the phantom menace.