How about we combat the existent Christian bias.
How about we combat the existent Christian bias.
The other part of it is they broke the rules so they need to face the consequences. They are asking for forgiveness and in this case I don’t think they deserve it.
Finally some carbon capture worth something.
Maybe if you would pay for training data they would let you use copyright data or something?
Nope there is no actual worm in the box, only magic smoke.
Hmm seems odd to me. I personally would not have even thought anyone would have second guessed pressing the button.
Woah are you technoreligious? Sure believe what you want and all but that is full tech bro bullshit.
Also on a different not just purely based off of you description doesn’t it seem like being able to just use search engines is easier than figuring out all of these intricacies for most people. If a tool has a high learning curve there is plenty of room for improvement if you don’t plan to use it very frequently. Also every time you get false results consider it equivalent to a major bug does that shed a different light on it for you?
I think you are either overestimating the number of lions or underestimating thr number of the other things. It is to some degree a pure numbers game and there are just not a lot of lions comparatively.
You could just keep going. The revolvers revolver needs an additional revolver.
If you got hit by a bus your chance for recovery would be better as a non-smoker than a smoker.
At a glance thought it was one of those raising nylons but this is way more impressive.
I would be against that, sure a button somewhere in a screen to turn eco mode on or off but not an on the fly thing.
Hmm, think I’ll trust the academic article over you.
I don’t think it’s that impractical or impossible to avoid almonds over other nuts.
So you won’t eat honey but will eat almonds, even though both are exploiting honey bees? Is because of it being a direct product vs a indirect product of honeybees. Is an in between layer where you draw your line?
One major honey bee related event every year is the mass migration of hives to pollinate almonds. Do exploitation of animals such as this affect your morals. If honey is considered a exploitation of honey bees I would also consider pollination another by-product of honey bee exploitation.
My wife is a PhD candidate studying honeybees so I trust her when I asked the question and the effects of honeybees on the environment are a tradeoff like everything in the world is but generally positive.
To mirror the honey bee conversation, soybeans replace native prarie lands throughout the Midwest. Soybeans hurt the environment so therefor they should not be supported. But to support our population we need massive food production. So it’s just not reasonable to avoid.
A massive population is really the root cause of almost all environmental issues imo. We have to blow so many things up to a high scale to support it and a self regulating population does not have the tools and responsibility for the massive reduction impact that is needed. Real change comes from an institutional level.
To the point of feral hogs at one point you mentioned the destruction of agriculture, I guess I was leaving the assumption open that feral hogs were destroying crops as the reason for the killings not them just being feral. I guess I am mainly raising the question of if your morals ever involve eating meat if it is killed under your ethical compass or if you consider the eating portion unethical in itself.
Is it not 3x + 1?