The “ham” suffix means farm or homestead. The Sandring part is a corruption of Sant Dersingham, with Dersing having been someone’s name. So the place was literally called “the sandy part of dersing’s farm” a thousand years ago and it got mangled with time.
I love the facade on the building second from right. It’s gorgeous.
Beans on toast isn’t a sandwich. If it’s anything, it’s an exotic form of pizza considering that it’s a flat bread with tomato sauce and a bean and cheese topping.
They’re uh… Radiators?
Cute little guy
I liked 2049 more than the original, but it’s very close.
Depends on where your house is, and if it’s urban or rural.
It provides enrichment for the kids, as they figure out how to get past it.
It’s not even marginallymighty
It’s like “I play baseball” vs “I play sports”.
I think more like “I play baseball” Vs “I play softball/rounders/cricket”.
It’s not that difficult to convince people who enjoy little league to try standard baseball.
People complain about it a lot, but I’ve never actually ran into a system that uses any maths beyond what a five-year-old should be capable of. Closest I think might be Mutants and Masterminds with stacking multipliers, but still just some extra steps. Nothing that knowing your times tables wouldn’t prepare you for.
The Facebook stuff is mostly old stable diffusion models or Dalle, because they’re free and relatively easy to use. Midjourney and the newer stable diffusion models get it right most of the time, and have an inpainting feature so you can tell the computer to do that bit again when they don’t.
Well, that’s nice to see.
They’ve been able to do hands fine for months now.
I assume this is something you can’t find a torrent for? You could always try the quick and dirty method of just taking a screen capture for the length of whatever it is you’re watching.
While piracy isn’t stealing, piracy does decrease profits of the rightful owner.
Only if you would otherwise have bought it. If you never had any intention to buy the thing, the rightful owner loses nothing.
IIRC, Japan doesn’t have punitive damages in civil cases, so the couple would have to prove they’ve been financially negatively affected to be awarded anything.
Regardless of his intent, he is correct as to the law.
With strict liability offences, if you do it, you are guilty. Intent does not come into it. The only question for the court is whether or not they did it, as the law is very clear.
So offending the state in China invokes the punishment of getting to experience the American reality?