Historically, Firefox has had fewer security measures than Chrome. For example, full tab isolation was only implemented recently in Firefox, many years after Chrome. MV3-only extentions in Chrome also reduce the attack surface from that perspective.

The counterpoint to this is that there are much fewer users of Firefox, so it less attractive to try to exploit. Finding a vulnerability in Chrome is much more lucrative, since it has the potential to reach more targets.

a CoT means externally iterating an LLM

Not necessarily. Yes, a chain of thought can be provided externally, for example through user prompting or another source, which can even be another LLM. One of the key observations behind these models commonly referred to as reasoning is that since an external LLM can be used to provide “thoughts”, could an LLM provide those steps itself, without depending on external sources?

To do this, it generates “thoughts” around the user’s prompt, essentially exploring the space around it and trying different options. These generated steps are added to the context window and are usually much larger that the prompt itself, which is why these models are sometimes referred to as long chain-of-thought models. Some frontends will show a summary of the long CoT, although this is normally not the raw context itself, but rather a version that is summarised and re-formatted.

Archived versions of Reddit pages haven’t worked for a while now. You can find snapshots listed, but when you try to load them, the comment section is empty.

Written with a lot of “help” from Claude Sonnet 4 LLM

Thanks, but no thanks.

I’m all for showing and discussing personal projects, but I don’t see what meaningful discussion we could have over something taken out of a black box.

To clarify, this would only have been triggered if you asked Gemini to parse your calendar events:

Once the victim interacts with Gemini, like asking “What are my calendar events today,” Gemini pulls the list of events from Calendar, including the malicious event title the attacker embedded.

Is asking the bot to read your calendar events and “summarize” them really an improvement over just looking at the calendar yourself?

An article brought to you by the leading authority on cutting-edge computer science research: BBC.

What if AI didn’t just provide sources as afterthoughts, but made them central to every response, both what they say and how they differ: “A 2024 MIT study funded by the National Science Foundation…” or “How a Wall Street economist, a labor union researcher, and a Fed official each interpret the numbers…”. Even this basic sourcing adds essential context.

Yes, this would be an improvement. Gemini Pro does this in Deep Research reports, and I appreciate it. But since you can’t be certain that what follows are actual findings of the study or source referenced, the value of the citation is still relatively low. You would still manually have to look up the sources to confirm the information. And this paragraph a bit further up shows why that is a problem:

But for me, the real concern isn’t whether AI skews left or right, it’s seeing my teenagers use AI for everything from homework to news without ever questioning where the information comes from.

This is also the biggest concern for me, if not only centred on teenagers. Yes, showing sources is good. But if people rarely check them, this alone isn’t enough to improve the quality of the information people obtain and retain from LLMs.

I realised that about a minute after I posted, so I deleted my commented right away :)

deleted by creator

Thank you!

Thanks for looking into it!

If you’re doing upgrades this weekend, do you think you could do Alexandrite as well? I’ve noticed that that’s also a few releases behind.

Could you give some examples of things that worked for you on Windows but couldn’t port over to Linux? I’m interested if they’re related more to games or just using Linux in general.

You should be happy. Mine does a different thing every time, no matter the setting…

Picocrypt is a very small (hence Pico), very simple, yet very secure encryption tool that you can use to protect your files. It’s designed to be the go-to tool for file encryption, with a focus on security, simplicity, and reliability.

Thanks! I think that’s the closest to what I was looking for, and it links to a couple more in the sidebar.

There are plenty of us technical folks here who have relevant experience and are keen on chatting, but lemmy is definitely generally pretty anti-ai.

I find this, too. Sometimes all it takes is for someone to start a thread and then a lot of good comments will be contributed!

How does GLM 4.5 (Air or regular) compare to more popular models? I picked its answer once on LMArena, but that’s all my encounters with it.

That’s a shame. Has the developer stated this, or is it just based on the lack of activity?

There seems to be a fork planning to continue the work. It was updated only a few hours ago.

Thanks a lot! This might just be enough to get me to actually try it!

Hi! I’m interested in trying Nushell at some point, although I keep putting it off…

Would you share your experience on a couple of items?

1. How easy was it to get started?
2. Do you find, or did you at least find in the beginning, that it is more suited for some particular tasks than using it as your day-to-day shell? If so, what were those?
3. Can you integrate it with existing tools that you know how to use from other shells, like grep or awk?

There is also duck.ai, which doesn’t required an account (and there’s no way to even have an account).

Mistral, the French AI, can also be used without an account through their chat app, and they give an option to exclude your data from training models, even for free users.