I was convinced OP had made a typo.
I was convinced OP had made a typo.
You’re missing Voyager and Lemmios.
You have never been able to defend what you said or quoted. Not once.
You never even tried. You got called out and immediately shut down and started insulting people.
Until the next big social media fuck up, which neither Spez nor Musk can stop themselves from making.
You’re just here early, and the platform still needs work. It hasn’t even hit 1.0 yet.
Case in point. Still can’t defend any of the bullshit you’ve been saying, still stuck insulting me instead. You have no point of view to defend here, just trolling.
Not a single one of your comments actually defends your interpretation or explains how it justifies viewing pit bulls as dangerous. Instead you’ve just been pretending to not understand a single sentence and insulting me.
You are running away because you can’t admit that reading the entire sentence (including the mention of a real threat) deflated everything you were trying to imply about pitbulls.
Real weird to waste your time online making up lies about a dog breed, dude.
Theirs is not a legitimate interpretation. They are trolling. You cannot reach their conclusion by reading that full sentence, which is why they took four words out of context.
It’s one sentence. Just read the entire sentence you snipped those four words from. You come to a completely different conclusion with that full context.
You deliberately took a phrase out of context to completely change the meaning and are not working extremely hard to pretend you didn’t understand the meaning of the original article. It’s very clear you aren’t here to argue in good faith, but are more likely trolling.
You didn’t even quote a full sentence, so yes it’s out of context. That’s how quoting things out of context works.
That is literally what this test is for, yes. Not all dogs are just pets, many are working dogs and part of their jobs is to protect their owners from real threats. This test simulates every possible circumstance.
Wildly disingenuous characterization of the test. It’s not a test of unwarranted aggression. You took four words out of context without reference to the fact that it says “in the face of a threat.” Dogs are supposed to protect you (or themselves) when faced with a real threat. So are humans.
No, because the author wants honesty. They’re still packing more batteries than these vehicles need, which is a problem.
Wouldn’t Tesla lying about range bee then minimizing their impact on the battery supply chain?
Not at all, they’re still stuffing their cars with lots of big batteries, and then lying about the range those batteries give.
Don’t worry, you won’t be able to afford this anyway.
If I had to guess based on years on reddit, Mastersmacks is on an unstable instance that’s causing him to double post. The other commenters aren’t bots, just unoriginal pranksters hazing Mastersmacks’ double post by copying and pasting.
It’s a dumb thing redditors would do all the time when someone accidentally double posted.
I think you’re far too willing to believe that every consequence of his actions is somehow intended and desired, like he’s playing 4D chess to acquire magic Attention Coins that are somehow going to translate into wealth and power later. The truth is that Elon is an impulsive idiot easily swayed by other idiots on the right, and this negative attention is only going to make it harder for him to ever make back the money he invested in Twitter, which in turn will tank Tesla.
Dang, how did you manage to nail the right font for X in a comment like that?
Consider this meme validated.