All Biden had to do was be unmemorable and he was guaranteed a second term. His ambitious foreign policy decisions (to put it lightly) and his lack of ability to pass meaningful change despite holding both chambers of Congress in his first 2 years doomed him.
It’s her turn
Obama has absolutely absurd charisma. He’s the Democrat version of Trump - knows exactly what to say to his base and knows how to convince moderates he’s not insane.
Clinton and Biden have the charisma of a limp noodle. Sanders has absurd charisma, but he’s seen as too big of a threat to Democrat lobbyists and big corporations.
Sanders would’ve mopped the floor with Trump because he would’ve actually been able to grab the 18-44 demographic (which last saw peaks in 1992 Clinton/Gore and 2008 Obama/Biden, both to unseat a Republican and, coincidentally, a Bush).
Sanders would have been able to avoid the collapse in turnout from working-class Black people in 2016.
Sanders would’ve stopped the increasing right-wing radicalization of the youth of America, or provided a counterweight for left-wing economic radicalization.
The US federal elections are basically a pony show and the DNC doesn’t know how to play the game without throwing out their playbook.
lmao imagine thinking that the Chinese government gives a shit what you say on social media that can’t be accessed in China
it’s pretty simply just control yourself on Chinese social media as if you are in public. that’s the only principle of the thing
Why the fuck is a mod so active in the comments trying to enter into arguments with people?
If anything, this is a post critical of the US lmao
You’re projecting
Does make you ask the question what other Western talking points are China are psyopped propaganda, though…
It’s interesting to see Reuters of all places admit to it, though.
Ukraine’s Kharkov counteroffensive fizzled. Ukraine’s counteroffensive from last year has lost almost all territorial gains (and then some). In what world does Ukraine stand a chance of reclaiming their lost territories?
Do you think revolutions go from 0 to 100 in a day?
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
I don’t see any language tag on my end
I disagree. ICBMs serve no purpose in a war unless you’ve already lost. Nuclear strike capability is suicidal and China’s no-first-use policy makes ICBMs completely irrelevant to the discussion of China’s war capability (particularly w.r.t. Taiwan and the SCS).
You don’t launch nuclear weapons unless you’ve lost and you want the other side to lose, too.
What even uses a liquid fuel in the Chinese arsenal? The newer Dongfengs are all solid fuel. US intelligence once again demonstrates their impeccable research ability.
I guess the DF-4, but it was mostly decommissioned ages ago. There’s like one or two hanging around for historical reasons.
Not internationally significant. This is US news.
Mods are so cute: denying that Israel is committing genocide, removing comments that say as much, and calling it “misinformation.”
Removed by mod
They support actual US propaganda more than they support well-trusted international news agencies like Associated Press and SCMP.
They’ve taken down Associated Press articles for “missinformation” and SCMP articles for “propaganda.” Yet, RFA/RFERL articles are perfectly fine.
Looking at the modlog, they also remove any comments that discuss their removal policy.
Not going to lie I was skeptical of Chinese fiscal policy recently… But turns out there’s a reason that I’m not a Chinese economicist.