Thanks. I will try all the suggested options and see which one is more convenient. :)

Thanks. I will try all the suggested options and see which one is more convenient. :)

Thanks. I will try all the suggested options and see which one is more convenient. :)

Yes, x86 legacy is really confusing. Especially if you are going to write your own kernel or bootloader.

Maybe simple and easy to use GUI Firewall.

Linux. The Power of the Community.

I didn’t come up with it and the picture is not mine. I just found it on the internet earlier.

You can fix it, really. :)

I use lxqt mostly beacause it’s simple and moderately lightweight.

It’s unusual, but it was a little-known Russian movie from which I didn’t expect much, but in the end I liked it. It was Lord of the Wind (2023). Although I usually don’t like modern movies lately. It is about Fyodor Konyukhov is a Russian survivalist, voyager, aerial and marine explorer and his round-the-world balloon flight. Unfortunately, I don’t know if it is available in English.

Thank you. Looks like.

Snap. :)

It’s called Paging. But an application programmer doesn’t really need to know how it works in precise.

Maybe It is possible to simply add functions to files that are not used anywhere with very delusional content. If people read it, they will easily understand that some nonsense is written in the function. Perhaps even with a comment that this is to protect against “AI” training. But only so that they do not repeat themselves and it is difficult to remove them all by one pattern…

Then I have nothing to fear. My code is already ready for this. :D

Thank you very much for your reply. I support your opinion in a way that I am already inclined that a complete prohibition on the training of “AI” models on the source code of software is not a very good solution and is difficult to limit according to current laws. I hope somtimes someone smart will come up with some approaches to such problems.

Yes I understand It’s complex question. In principle, I support the freedoms declared in the GPL. But the GPL license itself restricts the use of code in closed source proprietary programs for the sake of the freedom of all future users. And the question arises, isn’t the whole point of this nullified if you can train an “AI” model on this code, and then use the output from the “AI” of the same code in closed sourced proprietary programs? I wouldn’t mind if these “AI” were the same kind of free and open source software, but even then you can use their output to create your own closed source proprietary programs… Maybe you are right, it is not entirely clear what is better in this case.

That’s a good idea. Now I have to think about how to formulate it better and what it will mean. :)

But what will stop them from train copilot on code from other publicly available hostings. Are there any restrictions why they won’t be able to do it using something like the principles of fair use as an excuse in this case?

Even if that were the case, this is not a reason to destroy millions of people more. People’s lives matter the most. Russia definitely does not kill anyone unarmed and does not torture in these territories. And Russia has stated many times that it does not want to seize the whole of Ukraine.

It has sufficient list of programs: browsers (I use firefox), ebook readers, fractal (matrix), telegram, maps, that works good enough on mobile at least for my daily use.