03·
1 day agoAlot of the time the west uses Adrian Zenz (who you can read his Wikipedia page on why he is not trustworthy and is doubted even among European academic circles)
Here’s some reading and videos about the Uyghur stuff:
- 0 Posts
- 10 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: March 26th, 2022
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Yes, because Palestine is an undeniable issue that is as obvious as gravity, whereas this Uyghur stuff isn’t. Them reporting on a true genocide doesn’t stop them from being a western mouthpiece to parrot propaganda against their enemies.
Here’s some reading and videos about the Uyghur stuff:
But Palestine has heaps of evidence, this does not. Only anecdotes from questionable sources. They keep harping on about this to try to foment dissent and tear China apart.
Yea, I am. There used to be more controls about this stuff, but that was because China literally had lots of bombings from these Islamic fundamentalist groups. You can’t expect them to just let this stuff go and not have anything done.
That is not to say they could have done better and I’m not critical, but China has taken the best approach to this (which the Islamic Cooperation Community supported) which is re-education and re-integration with society.
They just continue to harp on these points with anecdotal evidence and no concrete sources. It is bullshit.
This stuff is obviously bullshit, and funded by the west. Decrying China for being anti-muslim and putting people into “concentration camps”, while simultaneously supporting the illegal settler colonial operation in Palestine
Yes, this is true! Palestine? I don’t know what you’re talking about.
14·9 days agoDon’t give in to the doomerism comrades, it must be socialism not barbarism.
Yea make more of this kind of stupid shit instead of spending resources on green energy or disease prevention. Acting like it isn’t the West that’s stoking all the fires of war across the world, or not partially to blame.
The first video is of a guy who was and idk if he still is a top source on the Xinjiang “human rights abuses” stuff. The second being another one of these “reliable sources”. I put the videos there to show how disingenuous these “sources” are.
The HRW article doesn’t have anything to prove these “sources” to be true. And so you can infer who is really trying to tell a lie.
Also if you still believe this stuff, HRW themselves have condemned Muslim countries who have investigated the conditions in Xinjiang, found nothing wrong and supported China.