As I said, the article is very poorly written. I’m unsure if they mean that there’s a Strat’ coming that’ll cost “SC” or if they are referring to the Warbond. Because Warbonds have always cost 1000SC. Zero change.
And no, it’s only your responsibility whether or not you engage with a specific game. There’s tons of great games out there, not every single one has to cater to your specific needs.
As the game is, it’s not a necessary addition by any means. So no, it isn’t a big deal.
Though I don’t know the price of it, I know it doesn’t take too long to play your way to enough “Super Credits” to pay for the Warbonds. I can’t imagine it’s so much more expensive than that.
Also, people may not like to hear it, but only they have a responsability in what hobbies they themselves choose. If you don’t have the time to play a grindy live-service game, then don’t buy it. Yes, that choice lies with you and you alone.
Neither the Developers or anyone else, has any responsability as to how you choose to spend you time.
There’s a million cool hobbies out there, find one that fits your schedule.
Edit: The entire article reads as if it was written by someone that hasn’t played the game. They use the words “Warbond” and “Stratagem” interchangeably. And write as if the Warbonds didn’t cost ‘Super Credits’ before. You’ve never been able to pay for a warbond with anything else.
That’s what Tolkien told us anyway.
Of the starter Frames, I’d say Mag. Hell, even endgame she’s my go-to when shit gets tough.
I am in this meme and I don’t know how to feel about it.
As if that has changed anything about Activision.
The list is longer. But it’s among the reasons.
It’s the primary demographic. Might as well just close the site.
The Meta changes fairly often, but most of the builds you can find on Overframe are still more than viable as most of the top rated bulds are made for steelpath. You can always take a bit of inspiration from there. Just remember to read how it works.
Don’t feel bad for them. Firewalk Studios may only have Concord to it’s name, but the Devs are all from Bungie and Activision. That should already ring some alarm bells.
They knew exactly what they were doing. They are the ones that sold the idea of Concord to Sony. For once I doubt Sony had to push for any of the bad decisions.
They didn’t waste $100 mill+ and 8 years development time on a random passion project. This was designed for a single reason, to make money in ridiculous amounts. To squeeze every penny out of kids and their parents.
I can’t feel bad for anyone that worked on something like that when it fails.
The marketing: “Valve might be making a new game…”
Everyone: “Oh my gooooood!?!?”
Only to be played for business purposes!
I’m honestly worried about the fanatisism surrounding US politics.
From the outside it looks downright horrifying.
As with all precious gems, stones and metals. It’s only worth something if someone wants to buy it.
This lady saw it’s practical worth, as a doorstop. I have to admit, I’m with her on this one.
I think they did. As people keep saying the gameplay was fun. It’s everything else that doesn’t work.
I’d recommend these games to anyone that likes CRPGs or the Post-Apoc setting.
Would however also recommend getting it from, pretty much, any other storefront.
Add into it that a game can offer much of the same as a movie and given that it’s an interactive experience, you’re not just cheering on the hero, you are the hero.
And the social experience was risky before, but with smartphones being so prevalent, it has skewed the chances heavily towards a negative experience.