In my field it’s often general journal policy, not an individual choice. It’s hit or miss, as it can be easy to guess who the reviewer or author is in a niche field. I personally don’t go out of my way to figure out the author’s affiliation, even if it can be trivial. Regarding self citations, those are usually obfuscated at the review stage. I’d say that a paper is easy to narrow down to a circle of scholars, but it might be the first paper of a research associate, a throwaway paper by a PI, or a paper that aims to engage those narrow specialists. So is a kind of smoke screen.

I actually robot-fed my kitten from day one, so they basically don’t associate me with food at all, just with cuddles and reprimands.

Thank God for double blind peer reviews, warts and all.

Aren’t those the stairs of mourning, i.e. the place where he was executed?

Cool! The weight of responsibility of the spiritual guide for a community.

Yes.

Tatakae!

Drittes Reich

I’m shipping up to Bostonnn

I remember playing with the little black and white marbles in the logo, or am I misremembering? I have tons of fond memories of the game.

Reminds me of a scene from Don’t Look Up

I see no indicators that this was AI. Lots of details, no inconsistency.

https://youtu.be/YRCmmJZRyJs?si=SyUW8QyahSJ0NsKj

My favorite band. This is one of the more traditional albums in terms of style, but also quite charming. Any similar bands? I can think of Haken and Toehider.

Hey everything, the massage is highly defined by now.

I can say with confidence that at least some call it homocide map, with the evidence you’ve provided. 🧐

Reminds me of this work by Latour. It goes into the tremendous amount of oftentimes political labor that goes into the establishment of new scientific knowledge as paradigmatic:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pasteurization_of_France

I know some of those words.

Classic first peak mindset right here.

Doctor Who!