Stamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 days agoNone. Suffer.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square157fedilinkarrow-up1969arrow-down118
arrow-up1951arrow-down1imageNone. Suffer.lemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 days agomessage-square157fedilink
minus-squareKazuyaDarklight@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39arrow-down1·2 days agoYes which is part of why the major chains are owned and controlled by companies, but then that makes the whole thing pointless. IMO, a company controlled blockchain may as well just be a DB cluster, it would be faster and more efficient.
minus-squarehddsx@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 days agoAre you saying that they “solve” that by never giving up more than 49% stake? That… seems like a bad solution
Yes which is part of why the major chains are owned and controlled by companies, but then that makes the whole thing pointless. IMO, a company controlled blockchain may as well just be a DB cluster, it would be faster and more efficient.
Are you saying that they “solve” that by never giving up more than 49% stake?
That… seems like a bad solution