by @LARSNEVERDIES@labirynth.zone, via @ErikUden@mastodon.de

  • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    The one preaching freedom but discrediting the others, while this can point to both, only one side does so because the opponent is hateful and intolerant. No tolerance for intolerance, isn’t a paradoxon. However both sides aren’t immune to extremism, so it’s on each person’s duty to fight back when blind group thinking immerges. We all believe we’re immune to going the wrong way, but it actually takes time and dedication, questioning your own motivation, to avoid fallacies. In perspective of both, the side they believe in is in the right, but only one on is destroying out of spit. It needs a fool to believe in both being equally bad, ignoring details of severity. Taking away an extremists voice, who’s spreading hate, isn’t suppression.