this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
65 points (89.2% liked)

Apple

17450 readers
206 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I know it's been a running joke for years now, but jesus christ the iPhones still start at 128GB and the regular 16 is still 60Hz and USB 2.0.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 months ago (9 children)

What are you guys storing in your phones? Mine hasn’t gotten anywhere close to full in years.

I’m starting to feel like I’m missing out on something important!

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 34 points 2 months ago (2 children)

4K videos of looking under the fridge

[–] navi@lemmy.tespia.org 4 points 2 months ago

Want to keep the flash on with the camera app open? Welp, guess you better start recording a video.

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I had to stop that after I recorded myself on the other side doing the same thing. Whenever I watch the video it gives me a blissful headache.

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's lame, but if you have kids, you'll blow your storage every few months. MUST CAPTURE EVERY MOMENT OF THEIR LIVES THAT I'LL PROBABLY NEVER WATCH AGAIN

[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 months ago

Hah, I had kids in the low-res era. By the time 4K rolled along they were already teenagers in the “put the camera away, dad” stage ;)

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

you'll watch em someday, probably drunk and sad, but you'll be happy you have them.

[–] Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

Wikipedia in English and Russian, music and videos in case I’m offline, a bunch of games and emulators, photos and videos taken in the last 30 days (the rest are on Immich), A Linux environment (iSH) and a bunch of junk

I have ~80 GB free out of 512

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

FLACs, Tidal's downloads and cache, photos from work that I can use as evidence, and a fuckton of memes. My previous phone had 64GB internal and I just about filled it before it died.

[–] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

photos from work that I can use as evidence

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

To me it's something I just don't want to have to think about. I already pay a lot for the device either way, so I want it to just work and not juggle around apps/media/etc.

My current iPhone is a 512 GB model and current usage is around 210 GB with photos already in iCloud. Record a couple of 4K videos and a 256 GB model would be full in no time (before uploading to the cloud, which can take a while when you're on the go with flaky network conditions).

My next phone will have at least 512 GB again, and I'm thinking about 1 TB as well, although the upgrade pricing is quite steep.

[–] falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Offline storage of Spotify music plus some local music files, bloated messaging apps, and then the majority would be photos and videos. Having cloud storage like Google One and a NAS helps, but having local files is also good when signal isn't great.

[–] Nurgle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Videos, “live” pics, and like a decade of text messages (w/ attachment)

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Would you like to see the 900 photos of my cats? Or would you like to see yesterday's photos of my cats?

[–] Mad_Punda@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

Not op, but yes, please.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] g0nz0li0@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

The 60hz screen is ridiculous. They need to make the phone WAY cheaper and acknowledge it's mid-tier. But Apple want it both ways - a premium brand charging premium prices and then shovelling bottom-end specs to funnel you to the even-more-expensive models.

I hate the stupidly low base storage, but personally am not impacted due to my usage patterns and having cheap cloud storage so I'm not as passionate with my disdain!

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

I really don't understand this trend outside of profit squeezing and pushing users to cloud storage subscriptions. Right now on Amazon $120 bags you 2 TB of 6 GB/sec consumer flash storage. Don't tell me they can't find another 128 GB, especially with economy of scale.

The year is 2024 and storage is cheap. No excuses.

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

You begin your comment saying you don't understand. And then you state the exact reasons why. You do know. You just hope your wrong. You aren't. Google (and Apple) have become worse then Microsoft.

[–] connaisseur@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago

Tim Apple needs to make sure his services department keeps growing its subscribers. Making the shareholders happy and secure his personal bonus payments.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Packaging flash storage onto the actual ~~SoC~~ SiP costs more than manufacturing the same amount of storage into an M.2 or external USB form factor, so that price can't be directly compared. They're making a big chunk of profit on storage upgrades, and on cloud subscriptions, but it's not exactly cheap to give everyone 1TB of storage at that base price.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That’s fascinating. My understanding was that flash storage is not physically integrated into the SoC but rather remains a separate ship that is sometimes stacked vertically.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You're right, it's not the same die, but the advanced packaging techniques that they keep improving (like the vertical stacking you mention) make for a much tighter set of specs for the raw flash storage silicon compared to what they might be putting in USB drives or NVMe sticks, in power consumption/temperature management, bus speeds/latency, form factor, etc.

So it'd be more accurate to describe it as a system on a package (SiP) rather than a system on a chip (SoC). Either way, that carries certain requirements that aren't present for a standalone storage package separately soldered onto the PCB, or even storage through some kind of non-soldered swappable interface.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] realitista@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

It's 100% to push people to cloud services.

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 months ago (6 children)

The only thing bothering me about the 16 is the 60hz. USB 2.0 and 128 GB don't affect me tbh.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Skunk@jlai.lu 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don’t really care about those but I guess the 16 mini wasn’t announced?

FFS, us 13 mini users only wanted that, hoping that maybe the mini will be made every x iPhone generation. Apparently it won’t be every 3 generations.

[–] MisterMoo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They’re not making a mini again. Ever. It’s ride or die with my 13 mini for at least a few more years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It’s not like it’s the flagship model. The Pro is the flagship with ProMotion and USB 3.2. The non-Pro and SE are lesser ships in the fleet with lesser features. Same situation as the iPad Pro vs. Air and other models. I am squarely mid-range with my iPhone 13 mini and iPad Air 4, and the only Pro feature tempting me is Face ID on iPad because work authentication through Touch ID feels tedious compared to Face ID on iPhone.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Most budget phones have usb 3.0 these days. Here's 74 phones under $300 with it. Many have had it for a close to a decade already. This is a transparent ploy to force people onto cloud services by making local sync incredibly slow.

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which days are “these days”? If it’s the past couple of years, the number is 13. That’s not most. Going back a decade, 74 out of 1,654 is also not most. Many? Sure. But most phones with USB-C are USB 2.0, and no one cares except people who don’t use iPhones but love to complain about them.

Most people are not going backwards to plug in their phones to backup data. Even those who do backup locally do so over Wi-Fi, which is now faster than USB 3. Fast, wired transfer is absolutely a necessity for professionals moving A/V data. The iPhone Pro is for them. For the rest of us, it’s not something I’d need, even if I was still doing regular local backup these days.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I use iPhones but hate the fact that I pay 3x as much as these phones for a sub par experience. I tried WiFi sync and it was unusable.

[–] ChrisG@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Artificial marketing segmentation by selling obsolete tech taken to bloody extremes. USB 2.0 is an insult

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

On one hand, yeah that isn't great. On the other hand, would you literally ever notice? My new phone is 6 years newer and multiple times faster than my old one and the only functional difference I've noticed is OLED screen vs not OLED. Nothing ever lagged before due to hardware, hasn't changed. Unless I'm using my phone as a USB drive, cord speed doesn't matter. I presume I have 3.0 speeds from USB c, but it could be slower than 1.0 and I wouldn't notice. 6 years of storage on my old phone got it to like 25gb used including the OS.

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can’t even begin to explain how much I notice it. So much that I made it my mission to replace all the screens I use with at least 120Hz, and I’m not even a gamer.

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

My laptop is 144hz and I leave my phone on 60 for battery reasons and I've not noticed any issues using my phone. Scrolled my app menu back and forth quickly to see if I was just ignoring it but that seemed fine.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I sync my music locally so I very much notice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Not using iPhone, but it's also partly why I'm hesitant on switching to the Pixel 9 Pro. Base P9P is 128GB with option of 256, ~~and the regular P9 is 128GB only~~ (Edit: it has 256 also). It's criminal.

[–] Subtex@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

the regular P9 is 128GB only

I've got the regular pixel 9 with 256. It's not limited to 128, it just is the base model size.

[–] falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm mistaken. Thanks for correcting! (Edit: looks like 256GB model is only limited to white and black, and the first color option on the Google store website is pink, which only has 128GB. Must be why I got mistaken. Thanks again!)

[–] Boggy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Something people don’t realize is that we enthusiasts that know what usb 2.0 means, make up such a small piece of Apple customers.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it's insane (but not surprising, I called it last year when everyone said that the base model would have 3.0 this year) that a high end expensive phone is still on USB 2.0

[–] Boggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Agreed if more people cared it would be fixed.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

And here I am with 256GB that’s never even half full.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

USB 2.0? Can't be serious... I thought it had to support USB-C

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is USB-C, but with USB 2.0 speeds

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago

"Premium". Goddamn.

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

USB C does have nothing to do with speed. There are lots of USB2.0 USB C devices out there.

load more comments
view more: next ›