this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
1012 points (97.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9602 readers
893 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 215 points 2 months ago (3 children)

[The signs] are placed along Hurricane Road at the last major intersection before arriving at the bridge crossing. Basically, there’s no way to miss them.

The reporter overestimates most truck drivers' situational awareness.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 118 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"I paid the most money to get the best truck and it can do anything. Ain't no fuckin' sign gonna tell me my truck can't do it!"

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 20 points 2 months ago

I'm not seeing any cops around here

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 84 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz 133 points 2 months ago (7 children)

So when is the driver getting charged for vandalism and littering?

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 66 points 2 months ago (5 children)

The driver suffered minor injuries but was able to exit the vehicle on his own. Luckily, no one else was hurt, considering the area is popular with swimmers and kayakers

[–] Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz 108 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The driver deserves criminal punishment in addition to the punishment of ignoring physics.

[–] Abnorc@lemm.ee 20 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Would this be a criminal offense? As much as it’s annoying that his car is so massive, he drove a street legal vehicle in the wrong place. Paying for the damages seems like a sufficient consequence.

[–] bahbah23@lemmy.world 66 points 2 months ago

Not a lawyer, but I would assume that reckless driving would apply here. If nothing else, he should be liable for the damages financially due to negligence

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If it's overweight, it's not street legal.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Street legal*

*not legal on all streets

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (5 children)

It was overweight for the bridge, not the road. It was from a commercial trucking company, so likely a dump truck. The first clue should be that it was a F-750. There are pickup beds for them, but they're almost always a flatbed or dump bed.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (3 children)

https://www.thedrive.com/news/overweight-ford-f-750-plunges-through-historic-wooden-bridge-in-maine

Repair estimates have not been released, but the owner of the truck company has offered to help pay for the rebuild. The incident itself remains under investigation by local authorities.

The trucking company has already offered to help pay for it. It's likely covered under their insurance and the driver is almost certainly been fired.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 118 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 98 points 2 months ago (12 children)

Read the actual article. This was a commercial vehicle that was hauling gravel. I think most folks are assuming it was some dumbass in a lifted truck with a few MAGA stickers on the back. That’s not the case.

The driver is still at fault for ignoring the posted weight limits, but it’s not like he was driving a personal vehicle, as much as we’d all love to see a some of these massive trucks and SUVs go through a bridge.

[–] zik@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Can we just have a bridge that detects MAGA trucks and ditches them then?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 94 points 2 months ago (3 children)

So some facts here:

  • Commercial truck carrying gravel
  • This was a rebuilt bridge, not a historic one
  • The owner of the construction company has proactively offered to pay for repairs
  • Yes, the driver is am idiot and made a mistake, and is probably going to hear about it for the rest of their lives.
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 44 points 2 months ago (6 children)

The couple that were driving the truck died, and thier house was sold to a new family, who they haunted.

[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 22 points 2 months ago

Sandworms... You hate 'em, right?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 66 points 2 months ago (9 children)

I just googled "Ford 750". No way this shit exists for real, seems like a Hot Wheels

[–] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 83 points 2 months ago

The idea is that it's the base for things like a dump truck, a gravel hauler, small firetruck, or other large commercial vehicle.

If anyone is driving one around as a form of transportation, they are probably avoiding therapy.

[–] LowtierComputer@feddit.org 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've used them for work. Some models can pull more than small tractor trailer rigs. Using them as a pickup truck is insane.

[–] SirDerpy@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

Yep: 650 dump trucks, 750 utility bed cranes.

[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It's a commercial vehicle. Very few, if any, people drive them as normal commuter vehicles.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 65 points 2 months ago (2 children)

one less wankpanzer on the road, just a shame a bridge had to be put in harms way to do so.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 59 points 2 months ago (5 children)
[–] teft@lemmy.world 103 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Damn. The posted limit on the bridge is 3 tons. The truck empty weighs 4.5 tons and they were hauling a full load of gravel. What an idiot. They better yank the driver's commercial license because he obviously wasn't reading any signs.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I used to live near a few covered bridges, and trucks would always be doing shit like this. They'd either be overweight and cause damage to the bridge (though never this bad) or they'd be too tall and drive off with part of the bridge attached.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 52 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Fun fact: school buses in the US are legally allowed to ignore posted weight limits on bridges. While this may seem particularly insane, usually on bridges the posted weight limit is not the weight that will make the bridge instantly collapse, it's the weight that if regularly exceeded by crossing vehicles will cause undue wear and require the bridge to be repaired or replaced sooner than it otherwise would have been. School buses are infrequent enough (and relatively light enough, even despite the child obesity epidemic) that they don't create a significant problem.

On a wooden bridge like this, though, the same logic does not apply. I sure wouldn't cross it in my school bus, but the height limit would preclude that anyway.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

I swear to god, the Ford F-750 looks like if you had asked AI to design the biggest lifted pickup specifically for the dudes with fragile masculinities and court-mandated anger management classes.

[–] NIB@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

F-750 is sold for specialized uses, as ambulance, crane vehicle, etc. It is a commercial vehicle, not a normal truck for private individuals. In fact, this picture is a modified F-750(well technically all F-750 are modified). Normally the truck comes just as a base platform and then you build stuff on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 40 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Cue car brains complaining about how their mini tanks must be supported by all infrastructure

[–] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But they also don't want to pay taxes or see any slowdowns due to repairs or upgrades. The same energy as a child wishing every day were Christmas.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PotentialProblem@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is this the plot to beetlejuice 2?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 36 points 2 months ago

What an asshole. There's no way they didn't know they were overweight either. Maybe they couldn't see the sign through all their 'rolling coal'.

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Probably thought the weight limit was a suggestion and not a hard constraint. Yikes

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sway_Chameleon@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

For once, an article reporting an "overweight Ford" causing a mess isn't referring to a politician in Ontario.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Posted weight limits were possibly ignored

(Emphasis added)

I think we can rule out any other possibility. Either they didn’t know the weight of their truck and ignored the weight limit, or they did know the weight of their truck and ignored the weight limit. Either way, they ignored the weight limit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] finley@lemm.ee 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Check for a nearby gothic revival farmhouse perched on a hill. There might be a pair of new ghosts in the attic (along with a cool miniature model of the town). Beware of the weirdo family that just moved in. The daughter is cool though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

I lived by a historic covered bridge as a kid. The people in the area would have been PISSED if something like this happened. The bridge was originally designed for horses and buggies, so if your vehicle weighed too much, you couldn't go on it.

load more comments
view more: next ›