this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
51 points (96.4% liked)

Games

16686 readers
781 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That and maybe the denuvo.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

The vast majority doesn't care about it, which is why games still manage to sell record numbers with it in place.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

In the trailers and screenshots for civ6, it looked far more realistic graphics than the actual gameplay, so despite seeing lots of cool looking things that are marketed as civ7, I still really have no idea what the game will actually look like.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Could be really good or completely destroy the franchise. I hope they know what they are doing.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Every time there's a change to Civ people say it could completely destroy the franchise... We're at number 7 now...

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 21 points 2 months ago

And they intentionally shake the gameplay up with each installment. I'm glad they do. Otherwise there's little point in doing a new one

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Yes, but this is a fundamental change to the formula far beyond anything before. It effectively resets the game twice during gameplay. In theory, it helps bound the complexity of the endgame. In practice we will have to see if it stays interesting or if it feels like it cheats you of all the work you’ve done.

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hint: if they are American devs in a big studio, the latter is more likely nowadays.

[–] arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

But civ (and rockstar) are take two's money printers, even executives know not to fuck this series up (hopefully)