Weird question that shows I really know nothing about this, but… why is there a “fastest car”? Is it a money thing, where they put all they can into one car then just do their best for the others? I would have thought if they have the technology they would want all their cars to have whatever it is that makes it the fastest.
The teams make everything about the car except the tyres and some of the electronics. This makes it a constructors championship as much as a drivers one. It’s amazing that all 10 teams get within a few percent of each other in absolute pace when they all get there by different ideas. For cost cap reasons, Limited amount of on track, wind tunnel and computational simulation time makes it hard to totally catch up if you make the wrong decisions before the season starts.
So the teams that hire and retain the best engineering talent, and have the best management structure to let them work effectively, tend to get the fastest car. It’s a human and technology optimisation equation.
And no they don’t put all the money into one car, they tend to be the same car for both drivers in a team unless they are testing one upgrade idea against another. There is a a cost cap and testing cap, which limits how much they can throw at brute forcing the optimal car.
I guess my question is one that arose when you said:
The bonkers thing is that with this announcement it means either the ozzy driver Riccardo will be promoted into the fastest car next year, or be out of the sport all together.
Why don’t all the drivers on the two red bull teams have the fastest car? Do they not share their designs?
No, the teams must design most of the car themselves. They are allowed to buy the engine, gearbox and some suspension parts from other teams. But all the aero parts and chassis must be designed in house. The FIA have access to their computer systems and factories to police this and the cost cap. The teams being constructors is a key feature of F1. Red Bull’s second team RB is based in Italy, while the top team is in the UK.
Weird question that shows I really know nothing about this, but… why is there a “fastest car”? Is it a money thing, where they put all they can into one car then just do their best for the others? I would have thought if they have the technology they would want all their cars to have whatever it is that makes it the fastest.
The teams make everything about the car except the tyres and some of the electronics. This makes it a constructors championship as much as a drivers one. It’s amazing that all 10 teams get within a few percent of each other in absolute pace when they all get there by different ideas. For cost cap reasons, Limited amount of on track, wind tunnel and computational simulation time makes it hard to totally catch up if you make the wrong decisions before the season starts.
So the teams that hire and retain the best engineering talent, and have the best management structure to let them work effectively, tend to get the fastest car. It’s a human and technology optimisation equation.
And no they don’t put all the money into one car, they tend to be the same car for both drivers in a team unless they are testing one upgrade idea against another. There is a a cost cap and testing cap, which limits how much they can throw at brute forcing the optimal car.
I guess my question is one that arose when you said:
Why don’t all the drivers on the two red bull teams have the fastest car? Do they not share their designs?
No, the teams must design most of the car themselves. They are allowed to buy the engine, gearbox and some suspension parts from other teams. But all the aero parts and chassis must be designed in house. The FIA have access to their computer systems and factories to police this and the cost cap. The teams being constructors is a key feature of F1. Red Bull’s second team RB is based in Italy, while the top team is in the UK.
Ah, that explains it. Thanks!