Or the government could just build trains out to there.
I saw a picture of a train station in China that had been built in the middle of nowhere. Stairs from the subway leading up onto a grassy field. The Americans all laughed at China for it. Then I saw a picture of that same train station five years later. It was in the middle of a metropolis. China has so much housing that there are entire cities sitting empty. Now, if a country with two billion people can manage that, Canada has no excuse.
That’s an infill station. Meaning it’s in the middle of an existing city. So, basically, right past the empty fields there was Chongqing in every direction.
Then I saw a picture of that same train station five years later. It was in the middle of a metropolis. China has so much housing that there are entire cities sitting empty.
When an entire city is sitting empty, there won’t be scandals over, say, stolen concrete and other embezzlement meaning that buildings are less reliable than they should be, maybe lacking elevators while having them on paper, or plumbing, or heating, or what not, or the city plan being impractical for the actual situation of many people living there (bottlenecks for transport and pedestrians alike or something like that).
Also the place where it’s been built may just not be feasible to live in.
People in the West are very gullible to fairy tales, like calling a despotic cleptocratic bureaucracy “meritocracy” and expecting it to lack the downsides of what they are used to without lacking the advantages.
But this
The Americans all laughed at China for it.
was, of course, wrong. Even if the state does nothing about it except selling land and permits for construction, a working train station in some place allowing to get to a big city reasonably fast would very soon mean lots of life around it.
It’s human, some things decay, other things take their place to decay later, and so on.
It’s not as much about names and political ideologies as it is about power of various groups and principles.
Or the government could just build trains out to there.
I saw a picture of a train station in China that had been built in the middle of nowhere. Stairs from the subway leading up onto a grassy field. The Americans all laughed at China for it. Then I saw a picture of that same train station five years later. It was in the middle of a metropolis. China has so much housing that there are entire cities sitting empty. Now, if a country with two billion people can manage that, Canada has no excuse.
I would look up “Tofu Dregs” before applauding China…
Oh boy, again with the stupid racist conspiracy theories
What conspiracy theory? The CCP has jailed people over it. It’s well known.
They called you a racist, so they win by default. /s
Oh my god are you a CIA agent or are you just stupid enough to blindly believe everything the CIA fking tells you?
Taiwan Number 1!
Oh yeah, weaponize that fking puppet state
Smh
Taiwan Best China!
I would think twice before repeating things I think I know about China from a picture I saw on the Internet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sfl4myL-K_8&ab_channel=NewChinaTV
https://www.reddit.com/r/transit/comments/12oe4u7/the_famous_caojiawan_station_yes_that_ghost_one/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caojiawan_station
https://en.rattibha.com/thread/1647469687335428097
Is this enough sources?
That’s an infill station. Meaning it’s in the middle of an existing city. So, basically, right past the empty fields there was Chongqing in every direction.
Yes, a very real city with very real residents, and definitely not a mostly-unfinished facade designed to keep the real estate bubble from popping. /sNo wait, it’s just an example of a station not in the middle of nowhere.
Wait 10 and see if it hasn’t collapsed by then.
When an entire city is sitting empty, there won’t be scandals over, say, stolen concrete and other embezzlement meaning that buildings are less reliable than they should be, maybe lacking elevators while having them on paper, or plumbing, or heating, or what not, or the city plan being impractical for the actual situation of many people living there (bottlenecks for transport and pedestrians alike or something like that).
Also the place where it’s been built may just not be feasible to live in.
People in the West are very gullible to fairy tales, like calling a despotic cleptocratic bureaucracy “meritocracy” and expecting it to lack the downsides of what they are used to without lacking the advantages.
But this
was, of course, wrong. Even if the state does nothing about it except selling land and permits for construction, a working train station in some place allowing to get to a big city reasonably fast would very soon mean lots of life around it.
It’s human, some things decay, other things take their place to decay later, and so on.
It’s not as much about names and political ideologies as it is about power of various groups and principles.