obbeel@lemmy.eco.br to Programming@programming.dev · 4 months agoGitLab is reportedly up for salewww.developer-tech.comexternal-linkmessage-square124fedilinkarrow-up1395arrow-down12cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1393arrow-down1external-linkGitLab is reportedly up for salewww.developer-tech.comobbeel@lemmy.eco.br to Programming@programming.dev · 4 months agomessage-square124fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmit.online
minus-squarebamboo@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoIf a license forbids LLM training, it is by definition not open source.
minus-squareparpol@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·4 months agoCode being visible for anyone to see is open source. The license for that code has nothing to do with it. You’re thinking of FOSS.
minus-squarebamboo@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoIncorrect. Open source means using a license that conforms to the open source definition. You can find that here: https://opensource.org/osd
If a license forbids LLM training, it is by definition not open source.
Code being visible for anyone to see is open source. The license for that code has nothing to do with it. You’re thinking of FOSS.
Incorrect. Open source means using a license that conforms to the open source definition. You can find that here: https://opensource.org/osd