finn_der_mensch@discuss.tchncs.de to There Was An Attempt@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months ago... to hide the brand of her clothing on tvdiscuss.tchncs.deexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1126arrow-down135
arrow-up191arrow-down1external-link... to hide the brand of her clothing on tvdiscuss.tchncs.definn_der_mensch@discuss.tchncs.de to There Was An Attempt@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-squareVaquedoso@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21arrow-down2·edit-24 months agoYeah, i recognize the brand, but i thought it had to be more than that. The purpose of censoring the logo is usually legal and to be clear what is and what is not product placement. That is done correctly, so i’d say this doesn’t fit this community
minus-squarecriitz@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·4 months agoRight, it’s not about making it impossible to tell who made the clothing, it’s about hiding the legally trademarked logos.
minus-squarePyr_Pressure@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoIt’s sort of like blurring out the word Crocs on a pair of Crocs. There’s no point.
Yeah, i recognize the brand, but i thought it had to be more than that. The purpose of censoring the logo is usually legal and to be clear what is and what is not product placement. That is done correctly, so i’d say this doesn’t fit this community
Right, it’s not about making it impossible to tell who made the clothing, it’s about hiding the legally trademarked logos.
It’s sort of like blurring out the word Crocs on a pair of Crocs. There’s no point.