• usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    And even suggests bone density is the same too despite what transphobes have been claiming here on lemmy lately…

    Transgender women’s bone density was found to be equivalent to that of cisgender women, which is linked to muscle strength.

  • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    IOC funded, but they were happy enough to throw us under the bus with their last trans inclusion policy, so I don’t see this making any difference. They’re not interested in science or fairness, they’re interested in not rocking the boat

  • solo@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Quite refreshing that this article was published by Forbes. Even tho I think more studies need to be made, I would argue that it’s public perception that needs changing. Public perception is not necessarily influenced by science, if that was the case we would be living in different societies worldwide. I think public perception is more influenced by the existing narratives, and we have a saying on them. Maybe among other things, we might need to start asking different/new questions?

  • retrospectology@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    Let the stammering retroactive qualifications by transphobes to explain away their chronic ignorance begin!

  • Kastorlain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    5 months ago

    Shame the comment section is full of people pre-emptively attacking anyone that might not agree with their own opinions.

    Thought there’d be people open to discussing the article, guess it’s not a whole lot different than Reddit or 4chan.

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      “Might not agree with their opinion” i.e repeating claims not grounded in actual data

      EDIT: also worth mentioning the account this comment is replying to is only 7 days old which raises some suspicions there

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, and calling them transphobes as if that’s the only motivation anyone has to be worried about this stuff.

      I’m running an experiment where I just ruthlessly block every single user demonstrating that kind of behaviour. Hopefully one day I’ll have a really slow feed consisting of only the handful of people left that don’t act like a total jerks despite being anonymous.