I’ve seen a few articles like this one from Futurism: “CEOs Could Easily Be Replaced With AI, Experts Argue.” I totally get the appeal, but these articles are more anti-labor than anti-CEO. Because CEOs can’t actually be disciplined with threats of automation, these articles further entrench an inherently anti-labor logic, telling readers that losing our livelihoods to automation is part of some natural order, rather than the result of political decisions that benefit capital.
You must log in or # to comment.