Suppose you’ve got an old PC - for arguments sake, assume a late 2000s PC with only 2GB RAM - which DE would you choose?

Note that whilst a simple WM + some lightweight apps might be a better option, to keep things simple, I’m limiting this poll to just DEs - and too ones which are still being maintained.

Also, in case you’ve voted for a non-obvious/“other” option, I’m curious to hear about your experiences on running that DE on an old machine - and why you’ve selected it over the more obvious choices.

  • Shareni@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 months ago

    From my experience it’s barely lighter than KDE. LXQT/LXDE destroy it in every benchmark and in every test I’ve tried.

    • kitnaht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s about 300mb lighter than KDE in my experiences. On 2gb of RAM, that makes a difference. Sure, going LXDE is gonna be fine too; but it lacks a lot of the polish that XFCE has. I honestly like both for different things.

      • Shareni@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s about 300mb lighter than KDE in my experiences. On 2gb of RAM, that makes a difference.

        And both LXDE and LXQT use half as much RAM as Xfce.

        LXDE is gonna be fine too; but it lacks a lot of the polish that XFCE has. I honestly like both for different things.

        I’d rather be able to open more than 5 tabs than have a fancy UI. That’s why Xfce is on my newer devices, and I install those 2 whenever someone needs an ancient laptop revived.

    • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      From my experience, while LXQt uses ~20-25% less RAM than XFCE, it runs way faster and uses less CPU than XFCE.