• Pronell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I have never thought of Red Lobster as particularly ‘affordable’, nor ‘beloved’ as the article repeatedly insists.

    I’m not taking sides at all, I’m sure the facts behind the article stand for themselves, but it feels like an attempt to be a sob story when a beleaguered and overpriced restaurant chain goes under - even if it was drowned.

    • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s peak “middle class fancy” to me. It’s not cheap, has not been for a while. But it’s the kind of place you could bring three kids and feel fancy, yet not totally blow the budget. It’s not “fine dining” but it’s a cosplay for a large demographic

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think it had more of an image of affordable classiness in the early 90’s. My family couldn’t really afford to eat out much back then, but I feel like eating at chain food places that had waiters was more of a rarity.

        Hell, back then wendys and pizza hut were considered a sit down restaurant for the family.

      • Pronell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ve never been and I’ve lived in the Midwest for most of my life. The few times I’ve loved seafood was when it was fresh.

    • Pistcow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve eaten at red lobster maybe once? But I’m from Seattle so if I want good seafood I’d just got to any dozen of the local redturants that buy local.

    • Fester@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The problem where I live is that there aren’t any other options for seafood-focused restaurants, and the fanciest of local regular restaurants are similarly priced ($100-150 for two) or cheaper while also serving much better food. The few places that are “higher tier” than that are weird old people bars that have giant spread-eagle nude paintings on the walls and their food is always disappointing.

      There’s nothing wrong with properly frozen seafood, so at the rate we went to Red Lobster, maybe twice per year, we’re better off satisfying our seafood cravings by buying at the store and preparing it at home. It will taste better at about 1/3 the price. We can spend our “fancy date” money at a local restaurant and have consistently better experiences all around.

      TBH I’m looking forward to Red Lobster not being an option anymore. Support your local restaurants.

  • LordGimp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Red Lobster is to seafood what Olive Garden is to Italian cuisine. It’s a sanitized American friendly chain that’s always prioritized appeal and convenience over everything else. It’s the place you go when you have a vague feeling you’d like something similar to sea food but don’t really want to think very much. And it’s just bankruptcy. They’re not actually going out of business. My local place isn’t even closing.

    • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Get some Bisquick Pancake mix, get some shredded cheddar cheese.

      That’s it my friend, you’ve created cheddar bay biscuit mix. I personally think it’s better.

  • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I was a contributor to the fall of the original “all you can eat crab legs”

    I might have been a tiny girl at the time, but I packed them away, much to my mother’s horror and my father’s delight