Taxing unrealized gains would be unconstitutional.

  • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    Tax the obscenely rich, and spend it on better goals. There’s a huge problem with wealth inequality at the cost of majority well-being and it’s going to take taxes to fix it.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      7 months ago

      We already tax the rich. They already pay more than their fair share. If you have proof otherwise, I’d like to see it. The last tax cut actually increased revenue.

      • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Here’s an Oxfam report on wealth inequality. Some excerpts:

        • “Elon Musk, one of the world’s richest men, paid a “true tax rate” of about 3 percent between 2014 and 2018. Aber Christine, a flour vendor in Uganda, makes $80 a month and pays a tax rate of 40 percent.”
        • “Worldwide, only four cents in every tax dollar now comes from taxes on wealth. Half of the world’s billionaires live in countries with no inheritance tax for direct descendants. They will pass on a $5 trillion tax-free treasure chest to their heirs, more than the GDP of Africa, which will drive a future generation of aristocratic elites. Rich people’s income is mostly unearned, derived from returns on their assets, yet it is taxed on average at 18 percent, just over half as much as the average top tax rate on wages and salaries.”
        • “During the pandemic and cost-of-living crisis years since 2020, $26 trillion (63 percent) of all new wealth was captured by the richest 1 percent, while $16 trillion (37 percent) went to the rest of the world put together. A billionaire gained roughly $1.7 million for every $1 of new global wealth earned by a person in the bottom 90 percent.”
        • “According to new analysis by the Fight Inequality Alliance, Institute for Policy Studies, Oxfam and the Patriotic Millionaires, an annual wealth tax of up to 5 percent on the world’s multi-millionaires and billionaires could raise $1.7 trillion a year, enough to lift 2 billion people out of poverty, fully fund the shortfalls on existing humanitarian appeals, deliver a 10-year plan to end hunger, support poorer countries being ravaged by climate impacts, and deliver universal healthcare and social protection for everyone living in low- and lower middle-income countries.”
        • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          7 months ago

          Let’s focus on one as that’s easier.

          Elon Musk, one of the world’s richest men, paid a “true tax rate” of about 3 percent between 2014 and 2018. Aber Christine, a flour vendor in Uganda, makes $80 a month and pays a tax rate of 40 percent.”

          This is false. It’s easy to prove it false. It’s well documented.

          Between 2014 and 2018, Musk paid $455 million in taxes on $1.52 billion of income,

          https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/20/elon-musk-says-he-will-pay-over-11-billion-in-taxes-this-year.html

          So how did they come up with 3?

          Technically most of that wasn’t “income”. It’s capital gains. His salary is normally a dollar.

          • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Here’s another story about the 11-billion tax claim. What your story leaves out is: “The emphasis on Musk’s income comes amid speculation of his past tax filings. In June, a ProPublica investigation found that while Musk’s wealth had grown by nearly $14 billion from 2014 to 2018, he paid $68,000 in federal income tax in 2015, $65,000 in 2017 and none in 2018. Between 2014 and 2018, the investigation found, he had a true tax rate of 3.27%.”

            Here’s the ProPublica investigation mentioned, which is based on IRS documents. “We compared how much in taxes the 25 richest Americans paid each year to how much Forbes estimated their wealth grew in that same time period…According to Forbes, those 25 people saw their worth rise a collective $401 billion from 2014 to 2018. They paid a total of $13.6 billion in federal income taxes in those five years, the IRS data shows. That’s a staggering sum, but it amounts to a true tax rate of only 3.4%.”

            • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              7 months ago

              Ignore the 11 billion part. That’s for a different time period. Your quote was from 2014-2018.

              You don’t pay taxes on wealth. So your citation doesn’t understand tax law. Wealth can’t be taxed by the federal government because it’s unconstitutional. Basically they are idiots.

              We pay taxes on income and the rate changes on the type of income. Wealth isn’t income.

              • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Ignore the 11 billion part.

                You linked the 11-billion story though?

                The attitude of hiding behind loopholes and technicalities is how the US has ended up with in the state shown by this chart and tables - with 2/3rds of wealth owned by the top 10%, and only 3% of wealth held by the bottom 50%. I’ll continue to listen to your arguments, but as fair warning you are unlikely to convince me that the bottom 170ish million US citizens should only have access to 3% of the wealth (2023 data btw).

                • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  14
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  You linked the 11-billion story though?

                  As it had the 2014-2018 numbers.

                  The attitude of hiding behind loopholes and technicalities is how

                  It’s neither. It’s how our tax code is written. Most of their wealth I would assume is stock. It isn’t cash.

                  Almost all of elons wealth is stock.

                  I’d be fine saying stock sales are ordinary income including SS and Medicare. That would end some of this.

                  I’d be fine counting personal loans as income and rebate if needed when paid off.

                  Since capital gains are taxed lower. Many people have converted their pay to stock.

                  • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    It’s neither. It’s how our tax code is written.

                    In my defense, that’s precisely why I opened with the idea that we should tax the obscenely rich. As in, change the tax code. I haven’t alleged that Elon et al are criminally evading taxes (although I’ve heard rumblings of it happening in some cases), but rather I say the code needs to be revisited with levelling inequality in mind. I’ve even heard people like Mark Cuban explicitly say they believe their economic peer group should be taxed heavily. "Cuban urges people to get so “obnoxiously rich that when that tax bill comes, your first thought will be to choke on how big a check you have to write. Your 2nd thought will be ‘what a great problem to have,’ and your 3rd should be a recognition that in paying your taxes you are helping to support millions of Americans that are not as fortunate as you.”

                    Since capital gains are taxed lower. Many people have converted their pay to stock.

                    A fine example of using technicalities/loopholes/whatever you want to label it as a way to reduce taxes paid.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          I am fairly wealthy. I earn in the top in the top 5%. I’m in the top 1% for wealth While I’m not rich in your eyes, i am in the eyes of most people.

                • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  It matters because you use the term. As such it’s only fair to define the word. You claim I’m not in a club but won’t define the criteria. It’s just trolling to troll. I’m not a billionaire and wouldn’t want to be. I have enough wealth to retire now and spend over a million a year and never run out. Well unless Biden gets a second term then we are all screwed.

                  I defend what’s fair.