Microsoft employee:

Hi, This is a high priority ticket and the FFmpeg version is currently used in a highly visible product in Microsoft. We have customers experience issues with Caption during Teams Live Event. Please help

Maintainer’s comment on twitter:

After politely requesting a support contract from Microsoft for long term maintenance, they offered a one-time payment of a few thousand dollars instead.

This is unacceptable.

And further:

The lesson from the xz fiasco is that investments in maintenance and sustainability are unsexy and probably won’t get a middle manager their promotion but pay off a thousandfold over many years.

But try selling that to a bean counter

  • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    246
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    FFMPEG is a core technology. You literally cannot do anything with video without touching FFMPEG at multiple places in the stack.

    The fact that we have billions of dollars of revenue flowing through that software every day, but we rely on VOLUNTEERS to maintain it shows exactly how hollow the whole SV entrepreneur culture really is.

    Bunch of fucking posers wouldn’t know performance code if it kicked them in the face.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      103
      ·
      7 months ago

      The fact that we have billions of dollars of revenue flowing through that software every day, but we rely on VOLUNTEERS to maintain it shows exactly how hollow the whole SV entrepreneur culture really is.

      Exactly: I’m not mad about important things being run by volunteers – arguably, that’s a good thing because it means project decisions are made uncorrupted by profit motive – but I am mad about the profit being reaped elsewhere on the backs of their free labor.

      • Royce@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        7 months ago

        @grue @vzq this is such an interesting space. The general public has no idea how much of their software relies on open source code and voluntary community contributions. There have been so many attempts to figure out a way to compensate these maintainers, but it doesn’t seem like anything has really become the defacto solution. Open Collective and Tidelift are the closest things I can think of.

      • Rich Felker@hachyderm.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        @grue @vzq The key is that these folks are supposed to have both freedom & power to set direction independent of corporate shit, *and* compensation for their labor.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      They’re not going to invest in it if they don’t own it, and frankly I’m happy they don’t.

      • TechNom (nobody)@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Those same companies tell you that their products that you paid for don’t belong to you. You are just buying a license to use them. Sadly, this asinine concept is spreading even to hardware markets.

        I think it’s fair to ask them to take their own bitter pill. They should also invest without owning.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Bunch of fucking posers wouldn’t know performance code if it kicked them in the face.

      You mean JavaScript right?

      • TehPers@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        These days it’s all about Python, with AI being the hype and all. JS can at least try to compete.