And does it have anything to do with the unusual decision to let a zero-edit user open an arbitration request?

The crying “History” button at the top right sends its regards. Yes, the World Jewish Congress has published a report that demands Wikipedia add a feature to view the history of articles, see what actions were performed by whom, and “host forums and discussions within the Wikipedia community to address concerns about neutrality and gather feedback for policy improvements”. It also wants to force all admins and above to reveal their real names.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    8 months ago

    Calling anti Palestine protests pro Hamas or anti Semitism is not factual.

    Having a “antisemitic incident counter” which increases every time someone says “free Palestine” is not factual.

    • Aatube@kbin.socialOP
      0·
      8 months ago

      Again, labels, especially of antisemitism, are considered opinions and attributed.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        8 months ago

        The ADL is used as a source for “anti Semitism statistics” which are per definition rigged. An organisation that claims to be anti racism and prejudice which raison d’etre is to smear anyone including Jews which are against israel is not just “opinions”. The ADL is a piece of filth that enables Genocide by using anti-Semitism as a shield for israel.

        The ADL defies its entire point of existence. Classifying pro palestine protests as anti Semitic and hate speech is per definition a lie.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldEnglish
            21·
            8 months ago

            Which they also have no authority for becuase one of their other main goals is spread anti-Arab propganda.

            Under the guise of fighting hate speech, the ADL has a long history of wielding its moral authority to attack Arabs, blacks, and queers.

            In the present, the ADL has continued to militate against internationalist, intersectional anti-racism, and has used its status as “the nation’s premier civil rights organization” to do so. In a particularly painful example in 2016, the ADL’s director wrote a critique of the Movement For Black Lives policy platform, using the black spiritual phrasing of the civil rights movement: he told them to set aside intersectional bonds with Palestinian resistance and instead “keep our eyes on the prize.” At the same time, the ADL has consistently used the language of civil rights, and its position as an authority on them, to describe Israeli state military violence as liberatory and Palestinian resistance, including non-violent civil resistance, as extremist. This habit isn’t incidental: the ADL is now a vetter of content for YouTube, where videos relating to the Boyscott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement have been censored as hate speech. It has also reportedly joined forces with Facebook, Twitter, and Microsoft as well to “engineer solutions” to cyberhate, and is building a Silicon Valley “command center” to house these operations.

            And one of their source articles where it becomes rather apparent that the ADL heavily pushes for islamophobic legislation

            Shalev: You don’t think that “Muslim-baiting” is much more acceptable in the mainstream media than, say, “Jew-baiting”? There is a Congressman now who is calling for the authorities to keep track of the entire Muslim community.Foxman: I don’t think that’s Muslim-baiting. It’s a natural response. It may be wise or unwise. But I think America’s got an issue now, and not only America. You look at France, you look at London, you look at Amsterdam—most of these incidents have come from Muslim communities that have been brought in and are not assimilating. Just like after 9/11, America is now questioning where the balance is between security and freedom of expression: Should we follow the ethnic communities? Should we be monitoring mosques? This isn’t Muslim-baiting—it’s driven by fear, by a desire for safety and security.

            • Aatube@kbin.socialOP
              21·
              8 months ago

              I won’t reply further if you can’t separate bias from objective facts, especially those that are tangential to the bias, such as the history and key persons of a white supremacist group that doesn’t involve Arabs.

              • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldEnglish
                21·
                8 months ago

                Pretend Arabs don’t exist as a minority and falsifying antisemitism claims isn’t real!

                Just seperate the lies from the truth, ignore the lies and then they don’t lie anymore!

                You have been linked plenty of evidence. There’s far more out there and you’re welcome to go look it up for yourself.