qwioeue@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 8 months agoArch with XZlemmy.worldimagemessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up136arrow-down110
arrow-up126arrow-down1imageArch with XZlemmy.worldqwioeue@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square58fedilink
minus-squareDefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoIn the case of Arch the backdoor also wasn’t inserted into liblzma at all, because at build time there was a check to see if it’s being built on a deb or rpm based system, and only inserts it in those two cases. See https://gist.github.com/thesamesam/223949d5a074ebc3dce9ee78baad9e27 for an analysis of the situation. So even if Arch built their xz binaries off the backdoored tarball, it was never actually vulnerable.
In the case of Arch the backdoor also wasn’t inserted into liblzma at all, because at build time there was a check to see if it’s being built on a deb or rpm based system, and only inserts it in those two cases.
See https://gist.github.com/thesamesam/223949d5a074ebc3dce9ee78baad9e27 for an analysis of the situation.
So even if Arch built their xz binaries off the backdoored tarball, it was never actually vulnerable.