A community index of servers added a new rule recently, that requires every participant to defederate from Threads. Some admins are unhappy.

Server indexes of places for newcomers to join can be instrumental for Fediverse adoption. However, sudden rule changes can leave some admins feeling pressure to change policies in order to remain listed.

  • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
    5·
    8 months ago

    I agree.

    I think a good example is how Slack started off by having good IRC integration, then slowly added features which were incompatible with IRC, and finally terminated IRC integration.

    So clearly, Slack killed IRC, right? (…of course they didn’t!)

    I see the potential situation with Threads as similar.

    • niartenyaw@midwest.socialEnglish
      3·
      7 months ago

      the problem occurs when most of the content comes from Meta (they will likely have the vast majority of Fediverse users). especially if major communities exist on their instance. when meta decides to no longer support fedi integration, those in the fedi are forced to decide between staying with their communities by ditching the fedi and moving to threads or having many of their communities ripped away.

      meta will do this at some point as a play to draw users to them, but we can decide if we want to be affected when that comes to pass.