• ConMod@lemm.eeM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    Didn’t I already ask you to tone down the race stuff? I appreciate the content, but Id rather avoid this kind of stuff. TBH, I dont know if this is starting to cross the line into racism or if its just being bothered by racism or what.

    Man, I hate judgement calls.

    • Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Lol you don’t like the blatantly racist bullshit your blatantly racist subscribers post?

      Maybe you should stop working with the racist party.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        We don’t work with the democrats. It’s obvious the professor is not a republican.

        • Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Right, which is why she is correct in calling out racism. And then the respondent in that “article” goes on to spout the “family values” that you all like to parrot.

          Your fifth grade tier insult makes you look suuuuuper smart lemme tell ya.

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Imaginary racism isn’t racism. I doubt you read the article, but it’s mainly a world salad of hot garbage. Maybe read the actual study to see what it’s about? What point of hers do you expressly agree with?

            The Democrats are the ones who are racist as her article clearly calls out. They are the ones who created most of what she is complaining about.

            • Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Of course it’s hot garbage, it’s faux “news.”

              Have you read it? Just because someone finds systemic racism and expresses thoughts about it does not make them racist. But that doesn’t fit the narrative you’ve been taught to parrot.

              • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                What does Fox News have to do with study? The study is hot garbage.

                She didn’t find much. She created. The solution is remove welfare program and we solve her complaints. I’m all for that.

                  • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    It would solve her issue. We have charities that could serve the poor without government intervention. Now democrats don’t give to charities as much we conservatives but that’s a side note.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      The issue I see is it’s about the culture war but not tied to an event or policy. It’s the ranting of one professor.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          One professor is not the teachings of a university. Has the university put out a statement agreeing with her? Has the department head said anything? All I see is a statement from one teacher.

          • BottomTierJannie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            If I went and used my position as a federal employee to sling this type of political shit, I’d be out a job. It’s not exactly like the university is in the dark about what this teacher is doing.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              You are against free speech? Or just speech you don’t like? She isn’t tenured but this is why tenure is important.

              Did you read her research or just form an opinion based on the headline ?

              • BottomTierJannie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                She’s free to say whatever she likes, and the university is free to keep slime like her on. And similarly, I’m free to judge them based on their own speech.

                • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Read he study. The best solution to her complaints is end social programs. That would solve her complaints. End tanf, social security, etc and get complaints go away.

                  • BottomTierJannie@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Fucking as if. Her type will always find new shit to cry about. Just because she accidentally stumbled into a good idea once it doesn’t mean she deserves respect

        • Throwaway@lemm.eeM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          You make a good point. Its why Im hesistant. Its clearly about CRT and CRT-adjacent thinking, so Im thinking it should stay up.